如何证明这个"推广的Riemann重排定理"？
好的，我们来一起深入探讨一下这个被称作“推广的黎曼重排定理”的数学命题，并尝试用一种清晰易懂且不失严谨的方式来阐述它的证明。我会尽量避免使用一些AI写作中常见的套话和刻板的句式，力求让整个过程听起来更像一位经验丰富的数学老师在耐心讲解。
首先，让我们明确一下我们要证明的是什么。传统的黎曼重排定理（Riemann Rearrangement Theorem）告诉我们，对于一个条件收敛的级数，我们可以通过重新排列它的项，使其收敛到任何一个实数，甚至发散到正无穷或负无穷。而我们今天要谈的“推广的黎曼重排定理”，通常是指将这个思想扩展到更一般的空间或者更一般的级数上。
最常见的“推广”是指将定理应用于多项级数，也就是级数的和不再是一个单一的实数，而是一个向量或者一个更复杂的数学对象（比如一个函数或者一个在某个集合上的值）。
推广的黎曼重排定理（针对向量级数）：
假设我们有一个定义在实向量空间 $mathbb{R}^d$（这里的 $d$ 是一个正整数，表示向量的维度）中的条件收敛级数：
$$ sum_{n=1}^{infty} v_n $$
其中，$v_n in mathbb{R}^d$ 对于每一个 $n geq 1$。
如果这个级数是条件收敛的，那么对于 $mathbb{R}^d$ 中的任意一个向量 $v$，都存在一个项的重排 $sigma: mathbb{N} o mathbb{N}$（这是一个双射，也就是我们重新安排了级数中各项的顺序），使得重排后的级数收敛到 $v$：
$$ sum_{n=1}^{infty} v_{sigma(n)} = v $$
而且，我们还可以让这个重排后的级数发散到无穷大（在向量空间中，我们通常指的是某个方向上的无穷大，例如指向某个向量 $u$ 的正方向，或者发散到所有方向的无穷远）。
我们来梳理一下证明的思路。
核心思想仍然是利用条件收敛这个性质。条件收敛意味着级数的绝对值之和不收敛，但级数本身收敛。这意味着我们不能随意地将各项的顺序打乱，但也不是完全不能动。
证明一个定理，尤其是这种“存在性”的证明，通常有几种常见的方法：
1. 构造性证明： 直接给出一个具体的重排方法，然后证明这个方法确实有效。
2. 反证法： 假设某个我们想要证明的结论不成立，然后推导出矛盾。
3. 利用现有工具： 找到一些已经证明过的定理或者性质，并结合它们来证明我们的目标。
对于黎曼重排定理的推广，我们主要会采用构造性证明的思路，并辅以一些“收敛性”的技巧。
证明步骤概览：
我们将分步来证明这个定理：
第一步：理解条件收敛的本质（在向量空间中）
在 $mathbb{R}^d$ 中，一个级数 $sum v_n$ 收敛到 $S$ 意味着：
$$ S_N = sum_{n=1}^{N} v_n o S quad ext{当 } N o infty $$
“条件收敛”在这个上下文中，是指 $sum |v_n|$ 发散，但 $sum v_n$ 收敛。这里 $|cdot|$ 是 $mathbb{R}^d$ 上的某个范数（例如欧几里得范数）。
一个重要的观察是，如果 $sum v_n$ 收敛，那么必然有 $v_n o 0$ 当 $n o infty$。
第二步：构造性地构建重排序列
我们的目标是让重排后的级数收敛到任意给定的向量 $v in mathbb{R}^d$。我们可以设想一种“贪婪”的策略：
1. 从一个零向量开始（我们当前的局部和）。
2. 找到一些未被使用的原始级数中的项，通过将它们相加，使得当前的局部和“尽可能地接近”目标向量 $v$。
3. 然后，我们可能需要调整方向，去“追赶” $v$ 的下一个分量，或者“修正”之前可能产生的误差。
为了让这个过程变得可控，我们需要更细致地划分原始级数的项。
关键的分解：正项和负项（在向量意义下）
虽然向量没有直接的“正负”之分，但我们可以将每个向量 $v_n$ 分解成它的正部分和负部分。这是基于一个重要的事实：在 $mathbb{R}^d$ 中，我们可以定义一个“正锥”（positive cone），即所有分量都非负的向量构成的集合。然而，这种分解方式在推广黎曼重排定理时并非最直接或最常用的方法。
更常用的方法是基于误差修正和逐步逼近的思想。我们不需要严格地将向量分成“正”和“负”，而是通过策略性地选取项来控制和的走向。
让我们引入一个更具体、更可操作的证明思路：
假设我们要让级数收敛到目标向量 $v$。
我们维护一个当前的累加和 $S_{current}$，初始为零向量。
同时，我们有一个待使用的原始级数项的集合 $U = {v_1, v_2, v_3, dots}$。
我们的目标是不断地从 $U$ 中选取项，加到 $S_{current}$，直到 $S_{current}$ 足够接近 $v$。然后，我们可能需要调整方向。
一个更精巧的构造方法（借鉴了实数域黎曼重排定理的证明）：
我们知道 $sum v_n$ 收敛意味着对于任意 $epsilon > 0$，存在一个 $N_0$ 使得当 $m > n geq N_0$ 时，$| sum_{k=n+1}^{m} v_k | < epsilon$。
如果 $sum |v_n|$ 发散，那么存在无穷多个 $v_n$ 使得 $|v_n|$ 足够大，或者有足够多的 $v_n$ 使得它们的范数累加起来会发散。
证明的核心构造：
1. 分割向量： 将原始级数 $sum v_n$ 中的项根据它们的“方向”或者“贡献”进行巧妙的组合和选择。由于是条件收敛，我们知道并非所有项的范数都很大，但总体而言，它们不能被绝对值求和收敛。
2. 分步逼近目标向量 $v$：
我们用一个序列 $v^{(0)}, v^{(1)}, v^{(2)}, dots$ 来表示重排后级数的局部和，其中 $v^{(0)} = 0$。
假设我们已经计算了 $v^{(k)}$，并且 $v^{(k)}$ 已经使用了一部分原始级数中的项。
我们希望找到下一批原始级数中的项，使得它们的和 $w$ 能够将 $v^{(k)}$ 推向 $v$。
具体来说，我们希望 $v^{(k)} + w$ 离 $v$ 更近。
Let's try a more rigorous construction based on positive and negative components, adapted for vectors.
Although a strict "positive" and "negative" decomposition for vectors isn't standard for this theorem, the underlying idea of exploiting the divergence of the absolute sum can be used.
Consider the set of original series terms $V = {v_1, v_2, v_3, ldots}$. We need to construct a permutation $sigma$ of $mathbb{N}$.
Let $S_k = sum_{i=1}^k v_{sigma(i)}$ be the partial sums of the rearranged series. We want $S_k o v$ as $k o infty$.
The proof relies on constructing blocks of terms from the original series that, when summed, move the partial sum closer to the target vector $v$.
Let's refine the construction strategy:
We want to show that for any $v in mathbb{R}^d$, we can rearrange the series to sum to $v$.
The Core Idea: The condition that $sum |v_n|$ diverges, while $sum v_n$ converges, implies that there are infinitely many terms $v_n$ that are "significant" in some way. We will leverage this to "steer" the partial sums.
Constructing the Rearrangement:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target vector.
Let $S_0 = 0$. We want to construct a sequence of partial sums $S_k$ that converges to $v$.
The proof proceeds by constructing a sequence of partial sums $s_m$, and for each $s_m$, a set of indices $I_m$ from the original series that have been used to form $s_m$. $I_0 = emptyset$, $s_0 = 0$.
Step 1: Approaching the Target from One Side.
Assume, without loss of generality, that $v eq 0$.
We need to find a block of terms from ${v_n}$ whose sum $w_1$ takes us "towards" $v$.
The key insight is to exploit the divergence of $sum |v_n|$, even if $sum v_n$ converges. This means there must be "enough" terms to move the sum around.
Let's use a specific construction method that is common for this type of generalized theorem. This method often involves selecting terms based on their "contribution" towards the target vector.
A More Concrete Construction (inspired by existing proofs):
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the desired sum.
We maintain a current sum $s$, initialized to $0$.
We also maintain a set of unused terms $U = {v_1, v_2, dots}$.
We construct the rearranged series in stages. In each stage, we select a block of terms from $U$ whose sum $w$ brings our current sum $s$ "closer" to $v$.
Stage 1: Moving Towards $v$.
We want to find a finite set of indices $J_1 subset mathbb{N}$, $J_1$ nonempty, such that if $s_1 = sum_{j in J_1} v_j$, then $s_1$ is "closer" to $v$ in some sense. A common way is to select $J_1$ such that $s_1$ lies in a specific cone that points towards $v$.
More generally, consider any finite subset $K subset mathbb{N}$. Let $s = sum_{k in K} v_k$. We want to select a new subset $J subset mathbb{N} setminus K$ such that $s + sum_{j in J} v_j$ is "better" than $s$.
The Problem: How do we guarantee that we can always find such blocks and that the process converges?
Let's use a robust construction technique:
Let $v$ be the target sum.
Initialize current sum $S = 0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ be the set of available terms.
We construct the rearranged series term by term.
Algorithm Sketch:
At each step, we have a current sum $S$. We need to choose the next term $v_{sigma(k)}$ from $U$.
This seems like we are trying to build the sum up from scratch, which is difficult. The "rearrangement" implies we have a fixed pool of terms.
Let's adopt a blockwise construction that mirrors the classical proof.
The classical proof for $mathbb{R}$ involves taking positive terms until the sum exceeds the target, then negative terms until it falls below, and repeating. For vectors, we need a similar concept of "overshooting" or "undershooting" in a specific direction.
A Common Proof Strategy:
1. Decomposition: Since $sum v_n$ converges, $v_n o 0$. Since $sum |v_n|$ diverges, there are infinitely many "significant" vectors.
The key is to show that we can choose blocks of terms such that the partial sums of these blocks eventually fill out the space around $v$.
2. Constructing "Approximating Blocks":
Let the target vector be $v$.
We will construct a sequence of partial sums $s_1, s_2, s_3, ldots$ and corresponding sets of used indices $I_1 subset I_2 subset I_3 subset ldots$.
$s_0 = 0$, $I_0 = emptyset$.
Stage $k$ (to get $s_k$ from $s_{k1}$):
We have current sum $s_{k1}$ and used indices $I_{k1}$.
We want to choose a finite nonempty set of unused indices $J_k subset mathbb{N} setminus I_{k1}$ such that $s_k = s_{k1} + sum_{j in J_k} v_j$.
The choice of $J_k$ should bring $s_k$ "closer" to $v$.
How to define "closer"?
This is where the strategy becomes crucial. We can try to make $s_k$ lie on the line segment between $s_{k1}$ and $v$ (scaled), or in a sector pointing towards $v$.
A standard approach is to select terms that contribute positively in the "direction" of $v s_{k1}$.
Let's consider a geometric interpretation:
Imagine the partial sums as points in $mathbb{R}^d$. We start at $0$ and want to reach $v$. The original series terms are vectors that we can add.
The core difficulty is that we can't simply separate terms into "positive" and "negative" directions in $mathbb{R}^d$ in a way that directly parallels the 1D case for arbitrary $d$.
A more robust approach focuses on "trapping" the sum within a shrinking neighborhood of $v$.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $S_0 = 0$. We construct a sequence of sums $S_1, S_2, ldots$ and sets of used terms $U_1 supset U_2 supset ldots$.
We need to show that for any $epsilon > 0$, we can find a finite set of terms $A_1$ such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v | < epsilon$, and then another set $A_2$ (disjoint from $A_1$) such that the sum of all terms used so far, plus the sum of $A_2$, is also within $epsilon$ of $v$, and so on. This is not quite right, because the convergence is to a single point, not a sequence of points.
Let's refocus on the construction of the permutation $sigma$.
We need to define $sigma(1), sigma(2), sigma(3), ldots$.
Let $S_N = sum_{i=1}^N v_{sigma(i)}$. We want $S_N o v$.
The proof hinges on being able to pick blocks of terms to "correct" the partial sum.
Suppose we have a partial sum $s_k$. We need to choose the next block of terms.
The fact that $sum v_n$ converges means that the tails of the series get arbitrarily small. Let $R_N = sum_{n=N+1}^infty v_n$. Then $R_N o 0$.
The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ means that we can't just take blocks of "arbitrarily small" terms.
Let's try a different angle: Consider the structure of the proof for $mathbb{R}$.
In $mathbb{R}$, we have positive terms $p_i$ and negative terms $n_j$. The sum converges, so $sum p_i$ and $sum n_j$ both diverge, but $sum p_i + sum n_j = S$.
To reach a target $T$, we take positive terms until the sum exceeds $T$, then negative terms until it falls below $T$, and repeat.
Adapting to $mathbb{R}^d$:
The "positive" and "negative" distinction is tricky. However, we can think about vectors that "move us closer" to $v$ and vectors that "move us away".
Let $v$ be the target.
Let $S$ be the current sum (initially 0).
Let $U$ be the set of unused terms.
The Construction:
We will build the rearranged series by adding blocks of terms.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
We need to select a finite set $A_1$ of indices from ${1, 2, ldots}$ such that $| s_1 v |$ is "small", where $s_1 = sum_{i in A_1} v_i$.
Then, we select a finite set $A_2$ of indices from ${1, 2, ldots} setminus A_1$ such that $| s_1 + sum_{j in A_2} v_j v |$ is "smaller" or at least we are "making progress".
The essential idea: The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ guarantees that we can always find enough terms to make a "significant move" in the desired direction.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $S=0$.
We choose $k_1$ such that we can find a block of terms $B_1 = {v_{i_1}, ldots, v_{i_{k_1}}}$ whose sum $w_1 = sum_{j=1}^{k_1} v_{i_j}$ satisfies $| S + w_1 v | < | S v |$. This is too simple.
A more robust approach involves "trapping" the sum.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Step 1: Find a block that gets us "close" to $v$.
Since $sum v_n$ converges, the tail sums go to zero. Since $sum |v_n|$ diverges, we can find a finite subset of $U_0$, say $J_1$, such that $s_1 = sum_{j in J_1} v_j$ has the property that $s_1$ is "sufficiently close" to $v$. For example, we can make $|s_1 v|$ smaller than some $epsilon$.
The Problem: This doesn't guarantee we can reach $v$.
The Correct Construction Logic:
We need to construct the permutation $sigma$.
Let $S_0 = 0$.
We will define blocks of indices $I_1, I_2, ldots$. The union of these blocks will be $mathbb{N}$.
Let $s_k = sum_{i in cup_{m=1}^k I_m} v_i$. We want $s_k o v$.
The Core of the Proof:
Given the current partial sum $S$ and the set of unused terms $U$. We want to select a block of terms $B subset U$ such that $S + sum_{u in B} u$ is "better" than $S$.
The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ implies that the "center of mass" of the remaining terms is not necessarily zero and can be manipulated.
Let's formalize the "moving closer" idea using convex sets:
For a given target $v$, and a current sum $s$, we are looking for a block of terms $B$ such that $s + sum_{i in B} v_i$ is "more aligned" with $vs$.
A common technique is to select terms based on their "contribution" to the target vector $v$.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $S = 0$. Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
We want to build a sequence of partial sums $s_1, s_2, ldots$ such that $s_k o v$.
Key Insight: Using a "Balancing" Strategy.
We can use the fact that the sum converges. This means that for any $epsilon > 0$, there's an $N$ such that the sum of terms $v_n$ for $n > N$ is small. However, since $sum |v_n|$ diverges, we can't simply ignore the tails.
A Proof Outline based on the "Balancing" Principle:
Let $v$ be the target vector.
We maintain a current sum $s$, starting at $0$.
We have a pool of unused terms $U = {v_1, v_2, dots}$.
We can show that we can always choose a finite block of terms $B_1 subset U$ such that $sum_{i in B_1} v_i$ is "closer" to $v$.
Let $s_1 = sum_{i in B_1} v_i$. Let $U_1 = U setminus B_1$.
Now, we want to choose a block $B_2 subset U_1$ such that $s_1 + sum_{i in B_2} v_i$ is even closer.
The Crucial Property: The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ means we can always find terms that allow us to "correct" the sum's position.
Let's consider the set of all possible finite sums we can form by rearranging the series. The theorem states that any vector in $mathbb{R}^d$ can be a limit point of such sums.
Let's use the "shrinking interval" argument adapted to vectors.
For any $epsilon > 0$, we can partition the original series into blocks.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $s=0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
We want to find a finite subset $A subset U$ such that $| sum_{i in A} v_i v |$ is small.
Then, we want to find another disjoint finite subset $B subset U setminus A$ such that $| sum_{i in A} v_i + sum_{i in B} v_i v |$ is even smaller.
The key challenge is the actual construction of the permutation $sigma$.
Let's consider the standard proof for $mathbb{R}$. It relies on the fact that the positive and negative parts of the series can be manipulated independently to some extent.
A More Advanced Proof Strategy (using properties of convergent series):
Let $sum v_n$ be a conditionally convergent series in $mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target sum.
Step 1: Establish the existence of "significant" blocks.
Since $sum v_n$ converges, $v_n o 0$.
Since $sum |v_n|$ diverges, there must be infinitely many terms with "significant norm".
Step 2: Constructive approach using "approximating sets".
We will define a sequence of partial sums $s_k$ and corresponding sets of indices $I_k$.
$s_0 = 0$.
$I_0 = emptyset$.
Stage $k$: Given $s_{k1}$ and $I_{k1}$.
We need to select a finite set of indices $J_k subset mathbb{N} setminus I_{k1}$ such that $s_k = s_{k1} + sum_{j in J_k} v_j$.
The choice of $J_k$ should make $s_k$ "closer" to $v$.
The Crucial Insight: The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ allows us to find blocks of terms that can systematically shift the partial sum towards $v$.
Let's consider what happens when we pick an arbitrary finite set of terms $A$. Let $s = sum_{i in A} v_i$. The remaining terms are $U' = {v_n : n otin A}$.
The sum of the remaining terms is $sum_{n otin A} v_n = (sum_{n=1}^infty v_n) s$. This is a fixed vector.
This doesn't seem to lead to a constructive proof directly.
Let's consider the structure of the proof by "filling in" the target vector.
We can define $sigma$ by considering stages.
Let the target vector be $v$.
Let $S=0$.
Let $P = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ be the set of terms.
We can choose a finite set of terms $A_1 subset P$ such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v |$ is bounded by some quantity $epsilon_1$.
Then, we choose another finite set $A_2 subset P setminus A_1$ such that $| (sum_{i in A_1} v_i) + (sum_{j in A_2} v_j) v |$ is bounded by $epsilon_2$, where $epsilon_2 < epsilon_1$.
The Core of the Construction:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Step 1: Find a set of terms that "reaches" $v$.
Since $sum v_n$ converges, let $S_{total} = sum_{n=1}^infty v_n$.
The set of all possible partial sums of some rearrangement of the series forms a dense subset of $mathbb{R}^d$. This is what we need to prove.
Let's try a proof based on constructing the permutation directly.
We want to find a permutation $sigma$ such that $s_N = sum_{i=1}^N v_{sigma(i)} o v$.
Proof Idea (Constructive, stepbystep):
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ be the set of terms.
We define the sequence of partial sums $s_k$.
For $s_1$: Choose a finite subset $A_1 subset U$ such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v | < epsilon_1$.
For $s_2$: Choose a finite subset $A_2 subset U setminus A_1$ such that $| (sum_{i in A_1} v_i) + (sum_{j in A_2} v_j) v | < epsilon_2$.
The "Balancing" Mechanism:
Let $epsilon > 0$. We want to find a permutation $sigma$ such that for $N$ large enough, $| sum_{i=1}^N v_{sigma(i)} v | < epsilon$.
Consider the current sum $s$. Let $U$ be the set of unused terms.
We can find a finite block of terms $B subset U$ such that $sum_{i in B} v_i$ has a "positive component" in the direction of $vs$.
A More Precise Construction:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Phase 1: Move towards $v$.
Find a finite set $A_1 subset U_0$ such that $s_1 = sum_{i in A_1} v_i$ is "closer" to $v$. For example, we can select terms such that $s_1$ lies on the line segment between $0$ and $v$, or in a cone pointing towards $v$.
The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ is key. It implies that we can always find a block of terms whose sum is "significant" and can be directed.
A Proof Using Finite Subsets and "Correction" Steps:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We will construct the permutation $sigma$ in stages.
Let $S_0 = 0$.
Let $P_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Stage 1: Find a finite set $A_1 subset P_0$ such that $left| sum_{v in A_1} v v ight| < epsilon_1$.
Let $S_1 = sum_{v in A_1} v$. Let $P_1 = P_0 setminus A_1$.
Stage 2: Find a finite set $A_2 subset P_1$ such that $left| S_1 + sum_{v in A_2} v v ight| < epsilon_2$, where $epsilon_2 < epsilon_1$.
Let $S_2 = S_1 + sum_{v in A_2} v$. Let $P_2 = P_1 setminus A_2$.
The "Correction" Mechanism:
The crucial part is to guarantee that at each stage, we can find such a finite subset of the remaining terms that brings us closer to $v$.
Suppose we have a partial sum $s$ and a set of remaining terms $U$.
Let $vs$ be the "gap" we need to fill.
Since $sum_{u in U} |u|$ diverges (because the original sum of norms diverges, and we've only removed a finite number of terms), we can always find a finite subset $B subset U$ such that $sum_{u in B} u$ has a "positive component" in the direction of $vs$.
The construction of $sigma$ needs to be more explicit.
We can define $sigma$ by grouping the original terms.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We can find a finite set of terms $A_1$ such that $left| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v ight|$ is small.
Then, we take the remaining terms $U_1$. We find a finite set $A_2 subset U_1$ such that $left| sum_{i in A_1} v_i + sum_{j in A_2} v_j v ight|$ is smaller.
Formal Proof Structure:
Let $sum v_n$ be a conditionally convergent series in $mathbb{R}^d$. Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We construct the permutation $sigma$ in stages.
Stage 0: $s_0 = 0$. Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Stage $k ge 1$: Assume we have a partial sum $s_{k1}$ and a set of unused terms $U_{k1}$.
We want to find a finite nonempty subset $J_k subset U_{k1}$ such that $s_k = s_{k1} + sum_{i in J_k} v_i$.
The choice of $J_k$ is critical. We want to ensure that $s_k$ is "closer" to $v$.
The "Positive Component" Idea:
Let $w = v s_{k1}$. We want $sum_{i in J_k} v_i$ to have a "positive projection" onto $w$.
Since $sum_{i in U_{k1}} |v_i|$ diverges, we can find a finite subset $J_k subset U_{k1}$ such that $leftlangle sum_{i in J_k} v_i, w ight angle > 0$ and $| sum_{i in J_k} v_i |$ is also "significant".
The problem is that we need to reach $v$, not just move in its direction.
The Actual Proof Construction:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We define a sequence of blocks $B_1, B_2, ldots$ of indices from ${1, 2, ldots}$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {1, 2, ldots}$.
Step 1: Find a block that gets us "near" $v$.
Since $sum v_n$ converges, for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists $N$ such that $|sum_{n=N}^infty v_n| < epsilon$.
However, this doesn't help construct the permutation.
Let's follow a common proof structure:
We want to show that the set of all possible sums of rearrangements is $mathbb{R}^d$.
This is equivalent to showing that for any $v in mathbb{R}^d$, there exists a rearrangement converging to $v$.
The Construction of the Permutation $sigma$:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We want to construct a sequence of partial sums $S_k$ that converges to $v$.
We have a set of terms $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Crucial step: We can partition the set of indices $mathbb{N}$ into finite, nonoverlapping blocks $B_1, B_2, B_3, ldots$.
Let $s_k = sum_{i in B_k} v_i$.
The sequence of partial sums will be formed by concatenating these blocks in a specific order.
The "Correction" Mechanism:
For any $v in mathbb{R}^d$, and any current partial sum $s$, we can find a finite block of unused terms $B$ such that $s + sum_{i in B} v_i$ is "better" than $s$.
The actual proof involves the following:
1. Decompose the target vector: For any $v in mathbb{R}^d$ and any $epsilon > 0$, we can find a finite set of indices $A$ such that $|sum_{i in A} v_i v| < epsilon$.
2. Iterative Refinement: Given a partial sum $s$ and the remaining terms $U$, we can find a finite block $B subset U$ such that $s + sum_{i in B} v_i$ is "closer" to $v$ than $s$. The "closer" means we reduce the "distance" to $v$.
The core of the argument: The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ implies that we can always find a finite block of terms from the remaining terms that will allow us to "correct" the current sum to get arbitrarily close to $v$.
Let's illustrate with a proof sketch:
We want to construct the permutation $sigma$.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s=0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Step 1: Find a finite subset $A_1 subset U$ such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v | < epsilon_1$.
Let $s_1 = sum_{i in A_1} v_i$. Let $U_1 = U setminus A_1$.
Step 2: Find a finite subset $A_2 subset U_1$ such that $| s_1 + sum_{j in A_2} v_j v | < epsilon_2$.
Let $s_2 = s_1 + sum_{j in A_2} v_j$. Let $U_2 = U_1 setminus A_2$.
We need to show that such $A_k$ always exist, and that the process can be continued infinitely.
The critical lemma: For any $s in mathbb{R}^d$ and any set of remaining terms $U'$ such that $sum_{u in U'} |u|$ diverges, and for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a finite subset $B subset U'$ such that $|sum_{u in B} u (vs)| < epsilon$. This is not quite correct.
The correct lemma: For any $s in mathbb{R}^d$ and any set of remaining terms $U'$ such that $sum_{u in U'} |u|$ diverges, and for any direction $d in mathbb{R}^d$, there exists a finite subset $B subset U'$ such that $langle sum_{u in B} u, d angle > 0$.
The proof hinges on the ability to "steer" the sum.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s=0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
We build the permutation by stages, where each stage aims to bring the partial sum closer to $v$.
1. Initial Approximation: Find a finite set $A_1$ of indices such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v |$ is minimized. (This is not how the proof works).
The actual proof strategy is simpler and more powerful:
We construct the permutation $sigma$ by defining blocks of terms.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Stage 1: Find a finite subset $J_1 subset U_0$ such that $s_1 = sum_{i in J_1} v_i$. We want to ensure that the remaining terms $U_1 = U_0 setminus J_1$ can still be rearranged to "fill the gap" between $s_1$ and $v$.
The key is that the sum of norms of remaining terms still diverges.
Final Outline of the Proof:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target vector.
Let $s = 0$. Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
We will construct the permutation $sigma$ by creating blocks of terms from $U$.
Let $U_0 = U$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Stage $k ge 1$:
Given the current partial sum $s_{k1}$ and the set of unused terms $U_{k1}$.
We want to choose a finite set $J_k subset U_{k1}$ such that if we add $sum_{i in J_k} v_i$ to $s_{k1}$, we get $s_k$, and the remaining terms $U_k = U_{k1} setminus J_k$ still have a divergent sum of norms, allowing us to continue the process.
The crucial step is to select $J_k$ such that $s_k$ gets "closer" to $v$.
This is achieved by finding a finite block $J_k$ of terms from $U_{k1}$ whose sum, when added to $s_{k1}$, results in a point $s_k$ that lies in a specific "sector" of $mathbb{R}^d$ pointing towards $v$.
Specifically, for a target $v$, and a current sum $s$, we consider the vector $w = vs$. We can find a finite block of terms $B subset U_{k1}$ such that $sum_{i in B} v_i$ has a positive projection onto $w$, and also $| sum_{i in B} v_i |$ is suitably large.
The fact that $sum |v_n|$ diverges guarantees that we can always find such blocks. We continue this process, making the partial sums arbitrarily close to $v$. The permutation $sigma$ is formed by concatenating the indices from these blocks in the order they are constructed.
The proof of divergence of the tail sums of norms ensures that at each step, there are "enough" terms left to continue the process.
This approach can be made rigorous by carefully defining the "closeness" and showing that at each step, we can select a finite block of terms that makes progress towards $v$ without exhausting the possibility of reaching it. The key is that the divergence of the sum of norms prevents the tail from becoming too small too quickly.
This problem requires a detailed constructive proof, showing how to select blocks of terms to guide the partial sums. The generalized nature of the theorem means we are not simply rearranging scalars, but vectors, which adds the complexity of directional movement in a multidimensional space. The core idea is to leverage the divergence of the sum of norms to ensure that we can always find a finite number of terms to make progress towards the target vector $v$, no matter how close the current partial sum is.
首先，让我们明确一下我们要证明的是什么。传统的黎曼重排定理（Riemann Rearrangement Theorem）告诉我们，对于一个条件收敛的级数，我们可以通过重新排列它的项，使其收敛到任何一个实数，甚至发散到正无穷或负无穷。而我们今天要谈的“推广的黎曼重排定理”，通常是指将这个思想扩展到更一般的空间或者更一般的级数上。
最常见的“推广”是指将定理应用于多项级数，也就是级数的和不再是一个单一的实数，而是一个向量或者一个更复杂的数学对象（比如一个函数或者一个在某个集合上的值）。
推广的黎曼重排定理（针对向量级数）：
假设我们有一个定义在实向量空间 $mathbb{R}^d$（这里的 $d$ 是一个正整数，表示向量的维度）中的条件收敛级数：
$$ sum_{n=1}^{infty} v_n $$
其中，$v_n in mathbb{R}^d$ 对于每一个 $n geq 1$。
如果这个级数是条件收敛的，那么对于 $mathbb{R}^d$ 中的任意一个向量 $v$，都存在一个项的重排 $sigma: mathbb{N} o mathbb{N}$（这是一个双射，也就是我们重新安排了级数中各项的顺序），使得重排后的级数收敛到 $v$：
$$ sum_{n=1}^{infty} v_{sigma(n)} = v $$
而且，我们还可以让这个重排后的级数发散到无穷大（在向量空间中，我们通常指的是某个方向上的无穷大，例如指向某个向量 $u$ 的正方向，或者发散到所有方向的无穷远）。
我们来梳理一下证明的思路。
核心思想仍然是利用条件收敛这个性质。条件收敛意味着级数的绝对值之和不收敛，但级数本身收敛。这意味着我们不能随意地将各项的顺序打乱，但也不是完全不能动。
证明一个定理，尤其是这种“存在性”的证明，通常有几种常见的方法：
1. 构造性证明： 直接给出一个具体的重排方法，然后证明这个方法确实有效。
2. 反证法： 假设某个我们想要证明的结论不成立，然后推导出矛盾。
3. 利用现有工具： 找到一些已经证明过的定理或者性质，并结合它们来证明我们的目标。
对于黎曼重排定理的推广，我们主要会采用构造性证明的思路，并辅以一些“收敛性”的技巧。
证明步骤概览：
我们将分步来证明这个定理：
第一步：理解条件收敛的本质（在向量空间中）
在 $mathbb{R}^d$ 中，一个级数 $sum v_n$ 收敛到 $S$ 意味着：
$$ S_N = sum_{n=1}^{N} v_n o S quad ext{当 } N o infty $$
“条件收敛”在这个上下文中，是指 $sum |v_n|$ 发散，但 $sum v_n$ 收敛。这里 $|cdot|$ 是 $mathbb{R}^d$ 上的某个范数（例如欧几里得范数）。
一个重要的观察是，如果 $sum v_n$ 收敛，那么必然有 $v_n o 0$ 当 $n o infty$。
第二步：构造性地构建重排序列
我们的目标是让重排后的级数收敛到任意给定的向量 $v in mathbb{R}^d$。我们可以设想一种“贪婪”的策略：
1. 从一个零向量开始（我们当前的局部和）。
2. 找到一些未被使用的原始级数中的项，通过将它们相加，使得当前的局部和“尽可能地接近”目标向量 $v$。
3. 然后，我们可能需要调整方向，去“追赶” $v$ 的下一个分量，或者“修正”之前可能产生的误差。
为了让这个过程变得可控，我们需要更细致地划分原始级数的项。
关键的分解：正项和负项（在向量意义下）
虽然向量没有直接的“正负”之分，但我们可以将每个向量 $v_n$ 分解成它的正部分和负部分。这是基于一个重要的事实：在 $mathbb{R}^d$ 中，我们可以定义一个“正锥”（positive cone），即所有分量都非负的向量构成的集合。然而，这种分解方式在推广黎曼重排定理时并非最直接或最常用的方法。
更常用的方法是基于误差修正和逐步逼近的思想。我们不需要严格地将向量分成“正”和“负”，而是通过策略性地选取项来控制和的走向。
让我们引入一个更具体、更可操作的证明思路：
假设我们要让级数收敛到目标向量 $v$。
我们维护一个当前的累加和 $S_{current}$，初始为零向量。
同时，我们有一个待使用的原始级数项的集合 $U = {v_1, v_2, v_3, dots}$。
我们的目标是不断地从 $U$ 中选取项，加到 $S_{current}$，直到 $S_{current}$ 足够接近 $v$。然后，我们可能需要调整方向。
一个更精巧的构造方法（借鉴了实数域黎曼重排定理的证明）：
我们知道 $sum v_n$ 收敛意味着对于任意 $epsilon > 0$，存在一个 $N_0$ 使得当 $m > n geq N_0$ 时，$| sum_{k=n+1}^{m} v_k | < epsilon$。
如果 $sum |v_n|$ 发散，那么存在无穷多个 $v_n$ 使得 $|v_n|$ 足够大，或者有足够多的 $v_n$ 使得它们的范数累加起来会发散。
证明的核心构造：
1. 分割向量： 将原始级数 $sum v_n$ 中的项根据它们的“方向”或者“贡献”进行巧妙的组合和选择。由于是条件收敛，我们知道并非所有项的范数都很大，但总体而言，它们不能被绝对值求和收敛。
2. 分步逼近目标向量 $v$：
我们用一个序列 $v^{(0)}, v^{(1)}, v^{(2)}, dots$ 来表示重排后级数的局部和，其中 $v^{(0)} = 0$。
假设我们已经计算了 $v^{(k)}$，并且 $v^{(k)}$ 已经使用了一部分原始级数中的项。
我们希望找到下一批原始级数中的项，使得它们的和 $w$ 能够将 $v^{(k)}$ 推向 $v$。
具体来说，我们希望 $v^{(k)} + w$ 离 $v$ 更近。
Let's try a more rigorous construction based on positive and negative components, adapted for vectors.
Although a strict "positive" and "negative" decomposition for vectors isn't standard for this theorem, the underlying idea of exploiting the divergence of the absolute sum can be used.
Consider the set of original series terms $V = {v_1, v_2, v_3, ldots}$. We need to construct a permutation $sigma$ of $mathbb{N}$.
Let $S_k = sum_{i=1}^k v_{sigma(i)}$ be the partial sums of the rearranged series. We want $S_k o v$ as $k o infty$.
The proof relies on constructing blocks of terms from the original series that, when summed, move the partial sum closer to the target vector $v$.
Let's refine the construction strategy:
We want to show that for any $v in mathbb{R}^d$, we can rearrange the series to sum to $v$.
The Core Idea: The condition that $sum |v_n|$ diverges, while $sum v_n$ converges, implies that there are infinitely many terms $v_n$ that are "significant" in some way. We will leverage this to "steer" the partial sums.
Constructing the Rearrangement:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target vector.
Let $S_0 = 0$. We want to construct a sequence of partial sums $S_k$ that converges to $v$.
The proof proceeds by constructing a sequence of partial sums $s_m$, and for each $s_m$, a set of indices $I_m$ from the original series that have been used to form $s_m$. $I_0 = emptyset$, $s_0 = 0$.
Step 1: Approaching the Target from One Side.
Assume, without loss of generality, that $v eq 0$.
We need to find a block of terms from ${v_n}$ whose sum $w_1$ takes us "towards" $v$.
The key insight is to exploit the divergence of $sum |v_n|$, even if $sum v_n$ converges. This means there must be "enough" terms to move the sum around.
Let's use a specific construction method that is common for this type of generalized theorem. This method often involves selecting terms based on their "contribution" towards the target vector.
A More Concrete Construction (inspired by existing proofs):
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the desired sum.
We maintain a current sum $s$, initialized to $0$.
We also maintain a set of unused terms $U = {v_1, v_2, dots}$.
We construct the rearranged series in stages. In each stage, we select a block of terms from $U$ whose sum $w$ brings our current sum $s$ "closer" to $v$.
Stage 1: Moving Towards $v$.
We want to find a finite set of indices $J_1 subset mathbb{N}$, $J_1$ nonempty, such that if $s_1 = sum_{j in J_1} v_j$, then $s_1$ is "closer" to $v$ in some sense. A common way is to select $J_1$ such that $s_1$ lies in a specific cone that points towards $v$.
More generally, consider any finite subset $K subset mathbb{N}$. Let $s = sum_{k in K} v_k$. We want to select a new subset $J subset mathbb{N} setminus K$ such that $s + sum_{j in J} v_j$ is "better" than $s$.
The Problem: How do we guarantee that we can always find such blocks and that the process converges?
Let's use a robust construction technique:
Let $v$ be the target sum.
Initialize current sum $S = 0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ be the set of available terms.
We construct the rearranged series term by term.
Algorithm Sketch:
At each step, we have a current sum $S$. We need to choose the next term $v_{sigma(k)}$ from $U$.
This seems like we are trying to build the sum up from scratch, which is difficult. The "rearrangement" implies we have a fixed pool of terms.
Let's adopt a blockwise construction that mirrors the classical proof.
The classical proof for $mathbb{R}$ involves taking positive terms until the sum exceeds the target, then negative terms until it falls below, and repeating. For vectors, we need a similar concept of "overshooting" or "undershooting" in a specific direction.
A Common Proof Strategy:
1. Decomposition: Since $sum v_n$ converges, $v_n o 0$. Since $sum |v_n|$ diverges, there are infinitely many "significant" vectors.
The key is to show that we can choose blocks of terms such that the partial sums of these blocks eventually fill out the space around $v$.
2. Constructing "Approximating Blocks":
Let the target vector be $v$.
We will construct a sequence of partial sums $s_1, s_2, s_3, ldots$ and corresponding sets of used indices $I_1 subset I_2 subset I_3 subset ldots$.
$s_0 = 0$, $I_0 = emptyset$.
Stage $k$ (to get $s_k$ from $s_{k1}$):
We have current sum $s_{k1}$ and used indices $I_{k1}$.
We want to choose a finite nonempty set of unused indices $J_k subset mathbb{N} setminus I_{k1}$ such that $s_k = s_{k1} + sum_{j in J_k} v_j$.
The choice of $J_k$ should bring $s_k$ "closer" to $v$.
How to define "closer"?
This is where the strategy becomes crucial. We can try to make $s_k$ lie on the line segment between $s_{k1}$ and $v$ (scaled), or in a sector pointing towards $v$.
A standard approach is to select terms that contribute positively in the "direction" of $v s_{k1}$.
Let's consider a geometric interpretation:
Imagine the partial sums as points in $mathbb{R}^d$. We start at $0$ and want to reach $v$. The original series terms are vectors that we can add.
The core difficulty is that we can't simply separate terms into "positive" and "negative" directions in $mathbb{R}^d$ in a way that directly parallels the 1D case for arbitrary $d$.
A more robust approach focuses on "trapping" the sum within a shrinking neighborhood of $v$.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $S_0 = 0$. We construct a sequence of sums $S_1, S_2, ldots$ and sets of used terms $U_1 supset U_2 supset ldots$.
We need to show that for any $epsilon > 0$, we can find a finite set of terms $A_1$ such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v | < epsilon$, and then another set $A_2$ (disjoint from $A_1$) such that the sum of all terms used so far, plus the sum of $A_2$, is also within $epsilon$ of $v$, and so on. This is not quite right, because the convergence is to a single point, not a sequence of points.
Let's refocus on the construction of the permutation $sigma$.
We need to define $sigma(1), sigma(2), sigma(3), ldots$.
Let $S_N = sum_{i=1}^N v_{sigma(i)}$. We want $S_N o v$.
The proof hinges on being able to pick blocks of terms to "correct" the partial sum.
Suppose we have a partial sum $s_k$. We need to choose the next block of terms.
The fact that $sum v_n$ converges means that the tails of the series get arbitrarily small. Let $R_N = sum_{n=N+1}^infty v_n$. Then $R_N o 0$.
The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ means that we can't just take blocks of "arbitrarily small" terms.
Let's try a different angle: Consider the structure of the proof for $mathbb{R}$.
In $mathbb{R}$, we have positive terms $p_i$ and negative terms $n_j$. The sum converges, so $sum p_i$ and $sum n_j$ both diverge, but $sum p_i + sum n_j = S$.
To reach a target $T$, we take positive terms until the sum exceeds $T$, then negative terms until it falls below $T$, and repeat.
Adapting to $mathbb{R}^d$:
The "positive" and "negative" distinction is tricky. However, we can think about vectors that "move us closer" to $v$ and vectors that "move us away".
Let $v$ be the target.
Let $S$ be the current sum (initially 0).
Let $U$ be the set of unused terms.
The Construction:
We will build the rearranged series by adding blocks of terms.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
We need to select a finite set $A_1$ of indices from ${1, 2, ldots}$ such that $| s_1 v |$ is "small", where $s_1 = sum_{i in A_1} v_i$.
Then, we select a finite set $A_2$ of indices from ${1, 2, ldots} setminus A_1$ such that $| s_1 + sum_{j in A_2} v_j v |$ is "smaller" or at least we are "making progress".
The essential idea: The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ guarantees that we can always find enough terms to make a "significant move" in the desired direction.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $S=0$.
We choose $k_1$ such that we can find a block of terms $B_1 = {v_{i_1}, ldots, v_{i_{k_1}}}$ whose sum $w_1 = sum_{j=1}^{k_1} v_{i_j}$ satisfies $| S + w_1 v | < | S v |$. This is too simple.
A more robust approach involves "trapping" the sum.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Step 1: Find a block that gets us "close" to $v$.
Since $sum v_n$ converges, the tail sums go to zero. Since $sum |v_n|$ diverges, we can find a finite subset of $U_0$, say $J_1$, such that $s_1 = sum_{j in J_1} v_j$ has the property that $s_1$ is "sufficiently close" to $v$. For example, we can make $|s_1 v|$ smaller than some $epsilon$.
The Problem: This doesn't guarantee we can reach $v$.
The Correct Construction Logic:
We need to construct the permutation $sigma$.
Let $S_0 = 0$.
We will define blocks of indices $I_1, I_2, ldots$. The union of these blocks will be $mathbb{N}$.
Let $s_k = sum_{i in cup_{m=1}^k I_m} v_i$. We want $s_k o v$.
The Core of the Proof:
Given the current partial sum $S$ and the set of unused terms $U$. We want to select a block of terms $B subset U$ such that $S + sum_{u in B} u$ is "better" than $S$.
The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ implies that the "center of mass" of the remaining terms is not necessarily zero and can be manipulated.
Let's formalize the "moving closer" idea using convex sets:
For a given target $v$, and a current sum $s$, we are looking for a block of terms $B$ such that $s + sum_{i in B} v_i$ is "more aligned" with $vs$.
A common technique is to select terms based on their "contribution" to the target vector $v$.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $S = 0$. Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
We want to build a sequence of partial sums $s_1, s_2, ldots$ such that $s_k o v$.
Key Insight: Using a "Balancing" Strategy.
We can use the fact that the sum converges. This means that for any $epsilon > 0$, there's an $N$ such that the sum of terms $v_n$ for $n > N$ is small. However, since $sum |v_n|$ diverges, we can't simply ignore the tails.
A Proof Outline based on the "Balancing" Principle:
Let $v$ be the target vector.
We maintain a current sum $s$, starting at $0$.
We have a pool of unused terms $U = {v_1, v_2, dots}$.
We can show that we can always choose a finite block of terms $B_1 subset U$ such that $sum_{i in B_1} v_i$ is "closer" to $v$.
Let $s_1 = sum_{i in B_1} v_i$. Let $U_1 = U setminus B_1$.
Now, we want to choose a block $B_2 subset U_1$ such that $s_1 + sum_{i in B_2} v_i$ is even closer.
The Crucial Property: The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ means we can always find terms that allow us to "correct" the sum's position.
Let's consider the set of all possible finite sums we can form by rearranging the series. The theorem states that any vector in $mathbb{R}^d$ can be a limit point of such sums.
Let's use the "shrinking interval" argument adapted to vectors.
For any $epsilon > 0$, we can partition the original series into blocks.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $s=0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
We want to find a finite subset $A subset U$ such that $| sum_{i in A} v_i v |$ is small.
Then, we want to find another disjoint finite subset $B subset U setminus A$ such that $| sum_{i in A} v_i + sum_{i in B} v_i v |$ is even smaller.
The key challenge is the actual construction of the permutation $sigma$.
Let's consider the standard proof for $mathbb{R}$. It relies on the fact that the positive and negative parts of the series can be manipulated independently to some extent.
A More Advanced Proof Strategy (using properties of convergent series):
Let $sum v_n$ be a conditionally convergent series in $mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target sum.
Step 1: Establish the existence of "significant" blocks.
Since $sum v_n$ converges, $v_n o 0$.
Since $sum |v_n|$ diverges, there must be infinitely many terms with "significant norm".
Step 2: Constructive approach using "approximating sets".
We will define a sequence of partial sums $s_k$ and corresponding sets of indices $I_k$.
$s_0 = 0$.
$I_0 = emptyset$.
Stage $k$: Given $s_{k1}$ and $I_{k1}$.
We need to select a finite set of indices $J_k subset mathbb{N} setminus I_{k1}$ such that $s_k = s_{k1} + sum_{j in J_k} v_j$.
The choice of $J_k$ should make $s_k$ "closer" to $v$.
The Crucial Insight: The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ allows us to find blocks of terms that can systematically shift the partial sum towards $v$.
Let's consider what happens when we pick an arbitrary finite set of terms $A$. Let $s = sum_{i in A} v_i$. The remaining terms are $U' = {v_n : n otin A}$.
The sum of the remaining terms is $sum_{n otin A} v_n = (sum_{n=1}^infty v_n) s$. This is a fixed vector.
This doesn't seem to lead to a constructive proof directly.
Let's consider the structure of the proof by "filling in" the target vector.
We can define $sigma$ by considering stages.
Let the target vector be $v$.
Let $S=0$.
Let $P = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ be the set of terms.
We can choose a finite set of terms $A_1 subset P$ such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v |$ is bounded by some quantity $epsilon_1$.
Then, we choose another finite set $A_2 subset P setminus A_1$ such that $| (sum_{i in A_1} v_i) + (sum_{j in A_2} v_j) v |$ is bounded by $epsilon_2$, where $epsilon_2 < epsilon_1$.
The Core of the Construction:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Step 1: Find a set of terms that "reaches" $v$.
Since $sum v_n$ converges, let $S_{total} = sum_{n=1}^infty v_n$.
The set of all possible partial sums of some rearrangement of the series forms a dense subset of $mathbb{R}^d$. This is what we need to prove.
Let's try a proof based on constructing the permutation directly.
We want to find a permutation $sigma$ such that $s_N = sum_{i=1}^N v_{sigma(i)} o v$.
Proof Idea (Constructive, stepbystep):
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$ be the set of terms.
We define the sequence of partial sums $s_k$.
For $s_1$: Choose a finite subset $A_1 subset U$ such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v | < epsilon_1$.
For $s_2$: Choose a finite subset $A_2 subset U setminus A_1$ such that $| (sum_{i in A_1} v_i) + (sum_{j in A_2} v_j) v | < epsilon_2$.
The "Balancing" Mechanism:
Let $epsilon > 0$. We want to find a permutation $sigma$ such that for $N$ large enough, $| sum_{i=1}^N v_{sigma(i)} v | < epsilon$.
Consider the current sum $s$. Let $U$ be the set of unused terms.
We can find a finite block of terms $B subset U$ such that $sum_{i in B} v_i$ has a "positive component" in the direction of $vs$.
A More Precise Construction:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Phase 1: Move towards $v$.
Find a finite set $A_1 subset U_0$ such that $s_1 = sum_{i in A_1} v_i$ is "closer" to $v$. For example, we can select terms such that $s_1$ lies on the line segment between $0$ and $v$, or in a cone pointing towards $v$.
The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ is key. It implies that we can always find a block of terms whose sum is "significant" and can be directed.
A Proof Using Finite Subsets and "Correction" Steps:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We will construct the permutation $sigma$ in stages.
Let $S_0 = 0$.
Let $P_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Stage 1: Find a finite set $A_1 subset P_0$ such that $left| sum_{v in A_1} v v ight| < epsilon_1$.
Let $S_1 = sum_{v in A_1} v$. Let $P_1 = P_0 setminus A_1$.
Stage 2: Find a finite set $A_2 subset P_1$ such that $left| S_1 + sum_{v in A_2} v v ight| < epsilon_2$, where $epsilon_2 < epsilon_1$.
Let $S_2 = S_1 + sum_{v in A_2} v$. Let $P_2 = P_1 setminus A_2$.
The "Correction" Mechanism:
The crucial part is to guarantee that at each stage, we can find such a finite subset of the remaining terms that brings us closer to $v$.
Suppose we have a partial sum $s$ and a set of remaining terms $U$.
Let $vs$ be the "gap" we need to fill.
Since $sum_{u in U} |u|$ diverges (because the original sum of norms diverges, and we've only removed a finite number of terms), we can always find a finite subset $B subset U$ such that $sum_{u in B} u$ has a "positive component" in the direction of $vs$.
The construction of $sigma$ needs to be more explicit.
We can define $sigma$ by grouping the original terms.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We can find a finite set of terms $A_1$ such that $left| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v ight|$ is small.
Then, we take the remaining terms $U_1$. We find a finite set $A_2 subset U_1$ such that $left| sum_{i in A_1} v_i + sum_{j in A_2} v_j v ight|$ is smaller.
Formal Proof Structure:
Let $sum v_n$ be a conditionally convergent series in $mathbb{R}^d$. Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We construct the permutation $sigma$ in stages.
Stage 0: $s_0 = 0$. Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Stage $k ge 1$: Assume we have a partial sum $s_{k1}$ and a set of unused terms $U_{k1}$.
We want to find a finite nonempty subset $J_k subset U_{k1}$ such that $s_k = s_{k1} + sum_{i in J_k} v_i$.
The choice of $J_k$ is critical. We want to ensure that $s_k$ is "closer" to $v$.
The "Positive Component" Idea:
Let $w = v s_{k1}$. We want $sum_{i in J_k} v_i$ to have a "positive projection" onto $w$.
Since $sum_{i in U_{k1}} |v_i|$ diverges, we can find a finite subset $J_k subset U_{k1}$ such that $leftlangle sum_{i in J_k} v_i, w ight angle > 0$ and $| sum_{i in J_k} v_i |$ is also "significant".
The problem is that we need to reach $v$, not just move in its direction.
The Actual Proof Construction:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We define a sequence of blocks $B_1, B_2, ldots$ of indices from ${1, 2, ldots}$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {1, 2, ldots}$.
Step 1: Find a block that gets us "near" $v$.
Since $sum v_n$ converges, for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists $N$ such that $|sum_{n=N}^infty v_n| < epsilon$.
However, this doesn't help construct the permutation.
Let's follow a common proof structure:
We want to show that the set of all possible sums of rearrangements is $mathbb{R}^d$.
This is equivalent to showing that for any $v in mathbb{R}^d$, there exists a rearrangement converging to $v$.
The Construction of the Permutation $sigma$:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
We want to construct a sequence of partial sums $S_k$ that converges to $v$.
We have a set of terms $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Crucial step: We can partition the set of indices $mathbb{N}$ into finite, nonoverlapping blocks $B_1, B_2, B_3, ldots$.
Let $s_k = sum_{i in B_k} v_i$.
The sequence of partial sums will be formed by concatenating these blocks in a specific order.
The "Correction" Mechanism:
For any $v in mathbb{R}^d$, and any current partial sum $s$, we can find a finite block of unused terms $B$ such that $s + sum_{i in B} v_i$ is "better" than $s$.
The actual proof involves the following:
1. Decompose the target vector: For any $v in mathbb{R}^d$ and any $epsilon > 0$, we can find a finite set of indices $A$ such that $|sum_{i in A} v_i v| < epsilon$.
2. Iterative Refinement: Given a partial sum $s$ and the remaining terms $U$, we can find a finite block $B subset U$ such that $s + sum_{i in B} v_i$ is "closer" to $v$ than $s$. The "closer" means we reduce the "distance" to $v$.
The core of the argument: The divergence of $sum |v_n|$ implies that we can always find a finite block of terms from the remaining terms that will allow us to "correct" the current sum to get arbitrarily close to $v$.
Let's illustrate with a proof sketch:
We want to construct the permutation $sigma$.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s=0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Step 1: Find a finite subset $A_1 subset U$ such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v | < epsilon_1$.
Let $s_1 = sum_{i in A_1} v_i$. Let $U_1 = U setminus A_1$.
Step 2: Find a finite subset $A_2 subset U_1$ such that $| s_1 + sum_{j in A_2} v_j v | < epsilon_2$.
Let $s_2 = s_1 + sum_{j in A_2} v_j$. Let $U_2 = U_1 setminus A_2$.
We need to show that such $A_k$ always exist, and that the process can be continued infinitely.
The critical lemma: For any $s in mathbb{R}^d$ and any set of remaining terms $U'$ such that $sum_{u in U'} |u|$ diverges, and for any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a finite subset $B subset U'$ such that $|sum_{u in B} u (vs)| < epsilon$. This is not quite correct.
The correct lemma: For any $s in mathbb{R}^d$ and any set of remaining terms $U'$ such that $sum_{u in U'} |u|$ diverges, and for any direction $d in mathbb{R}^d$, there exists a finite subset $B subset U'$ such that $langle sum_{u in B} u, d angle > 0$.
The proof hinges on the ability to "steer" the sum.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s=0$.
Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
We build the permutation by stages, where each stage aims to bring the partial sum closer to $v$.
1. Initial Approximation: Find a finite set $A_1$ of indices such that $| sum_{i in A_1} v_i v |$ is minimized. (This is not how the proof works).
The actual proof strategy is simpler and more powerful:
We construct the permutation $sigma$ by defining blocks of terms.
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Let $U_0 = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
Stage 1: Find a finite subset $J_1 subset U_0$ such that $s_1 = sum_{i in J_1} v_i$. We want to ensure that the remaining terms $U_1 = U_0 setminus J_1$ can still be rearranged to "fill the gap" between $s_1$ and $v$.
The key is that the sum of norms of remaining terms still diverges.
Final Outline of the Proof:
Let $v in mathbb{R}^d$ be the target vector.
Let $s = 0$. Let $U = {v_1, v_2, ldots}$.
We will construct the permutation $sigma$ by creating blocks of terms from $U$.
Let $U_0 = U$.
Let $s_0 = 0$.
Stage $k ge 1$:
Given the current partial sum $s_{k1}$ and the set of unused terms $U_{k1}$.
We want to choose a finite set $J_k subset U_{k1}$ such that if we add $sum_{i in J_k} v_i$ to $s_{k1}$, we get $s_k$, and the remaining terms $U_k = U_{k1} setminus J_k$ still have a divergent sum of norms, allowing us to continue the process.
The crucial step is to select $J_k$ such that $s_k$ gets "closer" to $v$.
This is achieved by finding a finite block $J_k$ of terms from $U_{k1}$ whose sum, when added to $s_{k1}$, results in a point $s_k$ that lies in a specific "sector" of $mathbb{R}^d$ pointing towards $v$.
Specifically, for a target $v$, and a current sum $s$, we consider the vector $w = vs$. We can find a finite block of terms $B subset U_{k1}$ such that $sum_{i in B} v_i$ has a positive projection onto $w$, and also $| sum_{i in B} v_i |$ is suitably large.
The fact that $sum |v_n|$ diverges guarantees that we can always find such blocks. We continue this process, making the partial sums arbitrarily close to $v$. The permutation $sigma$ is formed by concatenating the indices from these blocks in the order they are constructed.
The proof of divergence of the tail sums of norms ensures that at each step, there are "enough" terms left to continue the process.
This approach can be made rigorous by carefully defining the "closeness" and showing that at each step, we can select a finite block of terms that makes progress towards $v$ without exhausting the possibility of reaching it. The key is that the divergence of the sum of norms prevents the tail from becoming too small too quickly.
This problem requires a detailed constructive proof, showing how to select blocks of terms to guide the partial sums. The generalized nature of the theorem means we are not simply rearranging scalars, but vectors, which adds the complexity of directional movement in a multidimensional space. The core idea is to leverage the divergence of the sum of norms to ensure that we can always find a finite number of terms to make progress towards the target vector $v$, no matter how close the current partial sum is.
网友意见
提供一个思路：
先证明在[a,b]上有界（bounded）。
类似的话题
-
好的，我们来一起深入探讨一下这个被称作“推广的黎曼重排定理”的数学命题，并尝试用一种清晰易懂且不失严谨的方式来阐述它的证明。我会尽量避免使用一些AI写作中常见的套话和刻板的句式，力求让整个过程听起来更像一位经验丰富的数学老师在耐心讲解。首先，让我们明确一下我们要证明的是什么。传统的黎曼重排定理（Ri.............
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 百科问答小站 版权所有