《王者荣耀》里最没存在感的射手英雄是哪一个？
说到《王者荣耀》里“最没存在感”的射手，这话题在玩家群体里其实挺有意思的，大家聊起来也是各有说辞。不过，如果非要找出这么一位，在经历了几番英雄调整、版本变迁，以及玩家们审美和玩法偏好的演变后，很多人会不约而同地指向那位“背负着悲惨命运的弓箭手”——成吉思汗。
为什么会是他呢？这得从几个方面来聊。
首先，游戏定位和核心机制的相对单一。成吉思汗的招牌就是他的“弯道飞鹰”和“追猎”被动。简单来说，他是个需要在大视野和草丛中才能发挥出最大威力的射手。在草丛里，他能触发加速和视野，这让他有位移和探视野的能力。但问题也来了，这个机制过于依赖地图的特定环境。一旦进入开阔平坦的野区或者被敌人提前发现，他的优势就大打折扣。不像其他射手，比如孙尚香可以靠滚来调整位置和输出，后羿、鲁班七号那种站撸能力强，黄忠架起炮台就是一座移动的火力点，成吉思汗的“草丛依赖症”让他显得有些“看天吃饭”。
其次，技能的“软性”和“联动性”不足。成吉思汗的技能，一技能是探视野和提供攻击力加成，二技能是放置陷阱，打出减速和伤害。这两个技能单拿出来，都不算特别具有“决定性”的控制或者爆发。他的输出主要还是靠平A，陷阱更多是用来配合平A打出持续伤害和控制，或者用来探视野和劝退。相比之下，有些射手的技能自带强控（比如虞姬的二技能免疫物理），或者有强大的爆发（比如狄仁杰的二技能解控加晕眩，或者后羿的大招远距离控制），成吉思汗的技能组合在瞬间的威胁性上就显得稍弱一些。他的“强”在于持续追击和环境配合，但这种“强”在很多激烈的团战中，往往会被其他英雄的“硬”控制和高爆发轻易化解。
再Speaking of the "most insignificant" marksman hero in Honor of Kings, this topic is quite interesting among players, and everyone has their own opinions. However, if we have to pick one, after several hero adjustments, version changes, and the evolution of player aesthetics and playstyle preferences, many people would point to that "archer burdened by a tragic fate" – Genghis Khan.
Why him? This needs to be discussed from a few aspects.
Firstly, the relatively singular game positioning and core mechanics. Genghis Khan's signature moves are his "Strafing Eagle" and "Pursuit" passive. Simply put, he is a marksman who needs to be in areas with large vision and bushes to unleash his maximum potential. In bushes, he can trigger acceleration and gain vision, giving him mobility and reconnaissance capabilities. But here's the issue: this mechanic is overly reliant on specific map environments. Once he enters open, flat areas or is discovered by enemies in advance, his advantage is greatly diminished. Unlike other marksmarksmen, such as Sun Shangxiang who can adjust position and output through her roll, Hou Yi and Luban VII who have strong standingandshooting capabilities, or Huang Zhong who becomes a mobile firepower point once he sets up his cannon, Genghis Khan's "bush dependence" makes him seem a bit "reliant on the weather."
Secondly, the "softness" and lack of "synergy" in his skills. Genghis Khan's skills, his first skill is for reconnaissance and providing attack power bonus, and his second skill is to place traps, dealing slowing and damage. Individually, neither of these skills is particularly "decisive" in terms of control or burst damage. His output mainly comes from basic attacks, and traps are more for continuous damage and control in conjunction with basic attacks, or for reconnaissance and dissuasion. In comparison, some marksmen's skills have inherent strong crowd control (like Xi Shi's second skill which can immunize physical damage) or powerful burst damage (like Di Renjie's second skill which can dispel and stun, or Hou Yi's ultimate for longrange control). Genghis Khan's skill set appears slightly weaker in terms of instantaneous threat. His "strength" lies in sustained pursuit and environmental coordination, but this "strength" in many intense teamfights is often easily neutralized by other heroes' "hard" crowd control and high burst damage.
Think about it, when the game enters the mid to late stages, teamfights become frequent and fierce. Every hero needs to contribute meaningfully. If Genghis Khan can't find a good bush to start his attack, or if the enemy team is adept at clearing bushes or using vision control to counter him, he often finds himself in an awkward position. He can't easily dive into the enemy backline like a burst marksman, nor can he stand and deliver consistent damage like a pure output marksman in an open field. His output relies heavily on hitting traps and kiting, which requires a high level of skill and a coordinated team.
Furthermore, his pick rate and ban rate have been consistently low for a long time. A truly impactful hero, even if not the strongest, will at least see some presence in highlevel play or have a dedicated player base. Genghis Khan, on the other hand, rarely appears in professional matches or highranked games unless there's a very specific niche strategy. This low presence is a strong indicator of his perceived weakness or lack of versatility in the current meta. When players have so many other strong and more straightforward marksman options available, why choose Genghis Khan, who has such clear limitations?
Lastly, the "fun factor" and player engagement. Many players choose heroes not just for their power, but also for the enjoyment of playing them. While some players enjoy Genghis Khan's unique playstyle, for many, the constant need to hunt for bushes and the potential for being ineffective in open areas can be frustrating. Other marksmen offer more immediate gratification, more obvious contributions to teamfights, or a more forgiving playstyle. This can lead to fewer players actively picking and mastering Genghis Khan, further contributing to his "low presence."
In summary, Genghis Khan's "insignificance" stems from a combination of his mechanics being too niche and environmentdependent, his skills lacking the "hard" impact seen in other marksmen, his consistently low pick and ban rates indicating a lack of meta relevance, and potentially a lower "fun factor" for the general player base compared to other options. While he can still be effective in the right hands and in the right situations, he often gets overshadowed by other marksmen who can contribute more reliably and with less specific requirements. He's like a specialized tool that's excellent for one task, but rather useless for most others.
为什么会是他呢？这得从几个方面来聊。
首先，游戏定位和核心机制的相对单一。成吉思汗的招牌就是他的“弯道飞鹰”和“追猎”被动。简单来说，他是个需要在大视野和草丛中才能发挥出最大威力的射手。在草丛里，他能触发加速和视野，这让他有位移和探视野的能力。但问题也来了，这个机制过于依赖地图的特定环境。一旦进入开阔平坦的野区或者被敌人提前发现，他的优势就大打折扣。不像其他射手，比如孙尚香可以靠滚来调整位置和输出，后羿、鲁班七号那种站撸能力强，黄忠架起炮台就是一座移动的火力点，成吉思汗的“草丛依赖症”让他显得有些“看天吃饭”。
其次，技能的“软性”和“联动性”不足。成吉思汗的技能，一技能是探视野和提供攻击力加成，二技能是放置陷阱，打出减速和伤害。这两个技能单拿出来，都不算特别具有“决定性”的控制或者爆发。他的输出主要还是靠平A，陷阱更多是用来配合平A打出持续伤害和控制，或者用来探视野和劝退。相比之下，有些射手的技能自带强控（比如虞姬的二技能免疫物理），或者有强大的爆发（比如狄仁杰的二技能解控加晕眩，或者后羿的大招远距离控制），成吉思汗的技能组合在瞬间的威胁性上就显得稍弱一些。他的“强”在于持续追击和环境配合，但这种“强”在很多激烈的团战中，往往会被其他英雄的“硬”控制和高爆发轻易化解。
再Speaking of the "most insignificant" marksman hero in Honor of Kings, this topic is quite interesting among players, and everyone has their own opinions. However, if we have to pick one, after several hero adjustments, version changes, and the evolution of player aesthetics and playstyle preferences, many people would point to that "archer burdened by a tragic fate" – Genghis Khan.
Why him? This needs to be discussed from a few aspects.
Firstly, the relatively singular game positioning and core mechanics. Genghis Khan's signature moves are his "Strafing Eagle" and "Pursuit" passive. Simply put, he is a marksman who needs to be in areas with large vision and bushes to unleash his maximum potential. In bushes, he can trigger acceleration and gain vision, giving him mobility and reconnaissance capabilities. But here's the issue: this mechanic is overly reliant on specific map environments. Once he enters open, flat areas or is discovered by enemies in advance, his advantage is greatly diminished. Unlike other marksmarksmen, such as Sun Shangxiang who can adjust position and output through her roll, Hou Yi and Luban VII who have strong standingandshooting capabilities, or Huang Zhong who becomes a mobile firepower point once he sets up his cannon, Genghis Khan's "bush dependence" makes him seem a bit "reliant on the weather."
Secondly, the "softness" and lack of "synergy" in his skills. Genghis Khan's skills, his first skill is for reconnaissance and providing attack power bonus, and his second skill is to place traps, dealing slowing and damage. Individually, neither of these skills is particularly "decisive" in terms of control or burst damage. His output mainly comes from basic attacks, and traps are more for continuous damage and control in conjunction with basic attacks, or for reconnaissance and dissuasion. In comparison, some marksmen's skills have inherent strong crowd control (like Xi Shi's second skill which can immunize physical damage) or powerful burst damage (like Di Renjie's second skill which can dispel and stun, or Hou Yi's ultimate for longrange control). Genghis Khan's skill set appears slightly weaker in terms of instantaneous threat. His "strength" lies in sustained pursuit and environmental coordination, but this "strength" in many intense teamfights is often easily neutralized by other heroes' "hard" crowd control and high burst damage.
Think about it, when the game enters the mid to late stages, teamfights become frequent and fierce. Every hero needs to contribute meaningfully. If Genghis Khan can't find a good bush to start his attack, or if the enemy team is adept at clearing bushes or using vision control to counter him, he often finds himself in an awkward position. He can't easily dive into the enemy backline like a burst marksman, nor can he stand and deliver consistent damage like a pure output marksman in an open field. His output relies heavily on hitting traps and kiting, which requires a high level of skill and a coordinated team.
Furthermore, his pick rate and ban rate have been consistently low for a long time. A truly impactful hero, even if not the strongest, will at least see some presence in highlevel play or have a dedicated player base. Genghis Khan, on the other hand, rarely appears in professional matches or highranked games unless there's a very specific niche strategy. This low presence is a strong indicator of his perceived weakness or lack of versatility in the current meta. When players have so many other strong and more straightforward marksman options available, why choose Genghis Khan, who has such clear limitations?
Lastly, the "fun factor" and player engagement. Many players choose heroes not just for their power, but also for the enjoyment of playing them. While some players enjoy Genghis Khan's unique playstyle, for many, the constant need to hunt for bushes and the potential for being ineffective in open areas can be frustrating. Other marksmen offer more immediate gratification, more obvious contributions to teamfights, or a more forgiving playstyle. This can lead to fewer players actively picking and mastering Genghis Khan, further contributing to his "low presence."
In summary, Genghis Khan's "insignificance" stems from a combination of his mechanics being too niche and environmentdependent, his skills lacking the "hard" impact seen in other marksmen, his consistently low pick and ban rates indicating a lack of meta relevance, and potentially a lower "fun factor" for the general player base compared to other options. While he can still be effective in the right hands and in the right situations, he often gets overshadowed by other marksmen who can contribute more reliably and with less specific requirements. He's like a specialized tool that's excellent for one task, but rather useless for most others.
网友意见
这种问题不妨试试排除法
因为存在感不高
所以脑海中不会马上浮现出来
所以能马上想到的肯定不算没有存在感
那么现在开始
计时二十秒
把你想到的射手英雄记下来
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Time's up!
然后打开王者营地
对照一下
看看漏了哪几个
那么他们就是最没有存在感的
（一本正经的胡说八道）
计时20s
我想到的：
后羿 伽罗 鲁班七号 虞姬 孙尚香 公孙离 马可波罗 黄忠
没想到的：
百里守约 李元芳 狄仁杰 蒙犽 成吉思汗
我有个大胆并且不切实际的猜想
如果收集足够多的数据
然后进行处理
就可以得到最最最没有存在感的那一个
（逃
应评论区要求，艾琳不算
目前来说，应该是成吉思汗
类似的话题
-
说到《王者荣耀》里“最没存在感”的射手，这话题在玩家群体里其实挺有意思的，大家聊起来也是各有说辞。不过，如果非要找出这么一位，在经历了几番英雄调整、版本变迁，以及玩家们审美和玩法偏好的演变后，很多人会不约而同地指向那位“背负着悲惨命运的弓箭手”——成吉思汗。为什么会是他呢？这得从几个方面来聊。首先，............. -
在王者荣耀的射手群体中，如果论“最吃保护”，那绝对绕不开伽罗这位英雄。我这么说是有道理的，因为和很多其他射手相比，伽罗对于队友的保护需求简直是呈指数级增长的。首先，咱们得聊聊伽罗的英雄机制。她是一个典型的后期输出英雄，前期比较弱势，主要的输出手段依赖于她的普攻和二技能的减速风筝。她的普攻自带长射程和.............
-
王者荣耀里说起“最难死的中单”，这可不是个单一答案能轻松概括的。因为“难死”这个概念，很大程度上取决于玩家的操作、对局势的判断，以及装备的选择。但如果非要挑几个公认的、在“生存能力”上有着极高造诣的中单，我心目中有这么几个。首先，绕不开的就是司马懿。这哥们儿之所以难死，很大程度上源于他那招牌的“位移.............
-
说到王者荣耀里最难死的英雄，这话题可够劲的，每个玩家心里都有自己的“不死鸟”。但如果要我“一说一”地选一个，那我的首选绝对是程咬金。你可能会觉得，一个近战的战士，还能比那些带着净化、复活甲的射手、法师更难死？这不扯淡吗？别急，听我细细道来。首先，程咬金最最核心的“不死奥义”，那还得是他的大招——しま.............
-
在王者荣耀的广阔战场上，我心里一直藏着一个特别想看到的全新英雄。如果能由我来设计，我希望他（或她）能带来一种全新的游戏体验，不仅仅是技能组合的创新，更是一种独特的风格和战术意义。我心目中的这位英雄，暂且叫他“碎星者”。背景故事设想：碎星者并非来自传统意义上的名门望族，而是源自一个被遗忘的古老文明的守.............
-
哈哈，说到王者荣耀里最离谱的中单，我脑子里立马就蹦出来一个英雄，那就是——梦奇！别看他现在可能没那么炙手可热，但要说“离谱”，梦奇绝对是种子选手。我第一次见识到他有多“离谱”，是在一次排位赛里，对面一个玩梦奇的，开局就有点不对劲。当时我玩的是一个常规法师，想着跟打野配合抓他一波。结果呢？我一个控制技.............
-
这个问题就像让我从一堆闪闪发光的宝石里挑出一颗最耀眼的，实在太难了！《王者荣耀》里的英雄们，每个都有自己的故事，自己的性格，他们的台词也各有千秋，总能在不经意间戳中我心底最柔软的地方。但是如果一定要选一句让我心跳加速的……我想那应该是 李白的那句：“浪，是一生的追求！”第一次听到这句话的时候，我正操.............
-
王者荣耀里，哪个位置最容易让人血压飙升，那绝对是打野位。别跟我说什么边路对线被抓、中路被压制，那些跟打野比起来，简直是小巫见大巫。打野这位置，就像是在一个巨大的棋盘上，你既要指挥自己的棋子（队友），又要盯着对方的棋子（对手），还得时刻关注盘面上的关键资源（野怪、暴君、主宰）。这活儿，得心应手是神，稍.............
-
王者荣耀的英雄们要去参加高考？这脑洞开得挺大，不过细细一想，还真有几个热门人选。要我说，最有可能捧走状元宝座的，非诸葛亮莫属。咱们先不看别的，单看诸葛亮这人设。在王者峡谷里，他就是个标准的“军师”形象，博学多才，心思缜密，运筹帷幄之中，决胜千里之外。这放到高考考场上，那就是妥妥的“学霸”模板。首先，.............
-
这个问题挺有意思，也问到了很多玩家的心坎里。你这个问题核心是想探讨，那些在路人局里叱咤风云的顶尖高手，跟职业选手相比到底差距有多大？我试着从几个方面来聊聊，尽量说得接地气一些。首先，我们得明确“最顶尖的路人王”到底是什么概念。在王者荣耀里，路人王这个词有点模糊。我们可以理解为那些段位极高，在匹配系统.............
-
要说《王者荣耀》里最“耐揍”的坦克，这事儿可说不准，毕竟每个英雄都有自己的看家本领，而且“耐揍”这个词本身就挺多维度的。是纯粹站得住？还是能扛伤害同时还能输出？亦或是能靠技能不断回复？不过，如果非要我挑一个在大多数情况下都让人头疼，越打越烦，越打越觉得“这玩意儿怎么打不死”的坦克，我脑子里第一个冒出.............
-
要说王者荣耀里“最废”的大招，这话题绝对能掀起一场“腥风血雨”的讨论。毕竟，每个英雄的大招都是他们最核心的技能，设计出来总有其存在的道理。但如果非要挑一个来“批斗”一下，那我得说说那个曾经让无数玩家捶胸顿足，现在也依然让很多人觉得“鸡肋”的——女娲的“创世神谕”。为啥说她的大招“废”呢？咱们得从几个.............
-
玩《王者荣耀》这游戏，总会有那么几局，气得你恨不得把手机砸了。我印象最深的一次，简直能把我气死。那天我玩的是李白，队友是貂蝉、铠、孙膑、还有个鲁班。开局挺顺的，我们这边节奏也还可以，压着对方打。我发育得不错，装备也渐渐起来了。然后，重点来了。游戏进行到中期，我们这边抱团推中路。对方守得很紧，貂蝉上去.............
-
玩《王者荣耀》，要说最让人生气、最不想队友选的打野，那必须是 百里守约。别误会，我不是说百里守约本身有多弱，而是很多时候，队友选了这个英雄，我的心就凉了半截。为啥这么说？我给你掰扯掰扯。首先，最最最让我糟心的一点是：“狙击”的艺术，往往变成“空大”的艺术。你们懂我意思吧？百里守约这个英雄的精髓就在于.............
-
这个问题很有意思，也让我想起很多关于王者荣耀皮肤的讨论。要说现在“最稀有”的皮肤，这其实是个挺主观的问题，因为“稀有”的定义有很多种——是绝版不复刻的？是只有极少数人才拥有的？还是那种很多人想要但又极难获取的？不过，如果让我来选一个目前公认的、在“稀有度”上拔尖的皮肤，我可能会指向——“蔷薇精灵”。.............
-
嘿，聊到这个话题，我脑子里第一个冒出来的，不是那种操作难度特别高、容易失误的英雄，也不是那种技能机制很奇葩、玩起来别扭的英雄。而是那些，怎么说呢，存在感太低，或者说，无论怎么玩，都感觉“啊，怎么又是他/她”的英雄。如果要说最“看不惯”的，我脑子里最先闪过的，大概是后羿吧。不是说后羿有多弱，也不是说玩.............
-
哈哈，要说在王者荣耀里，我最希望队友能拿什么中单英雄，这可得好好说道说道。毕竟，一个给力的大哥，能直接决定这局游戏的走向，甚至是你能不能舒舒服服地上分。要我说，我最希望队友能拿的，还得是那些有稳定控制、爆发足、同时还能兼顾支援和清线能力的中单。具体到英雄的话，我脑子里第一个闪过的，就是诸葛亮。为啥是.............
-
这个问题嘛，其实在《王者荣耀》里，“守塔最厉害的上单”这事儿，很难一概而论，因为它受很多因素影响，比如： 英雄的特性： 不同英雄有不同的技能组合，有些英雄本身就擅长清兵、消耗，有些则更偏向于抗压、阵地战。 玩家的操作和意识： 同样的英雄，不同玩家玩出来效果天差地别。一个意识好、操作溜的玩家，.............
-
说起《王者荣耀》里最被低估的英雄，这个问题其实挺有意思的，因为“被低估”这三个字本身就带点主观色彩，而且每个版本、每个玩家的理解都会有所不同。但如果非要我挑一个，我觉得杨玉环绝对算得上一个。我知道，听到杨玉环，可能不少人会皱眉，觉得她操作复杂，节奏慢，或者就是觉得她团战作用不如其他同定位的英雄。但我.............
-
要说《王者荣耀》里哪个英雄最像咱们普通人，这事儿挺有意思的，因为游戏里的英雄大多都有着超乎寻常的能力、背景或者说是“光环”。但如果真要找一个“最接近”的，我脑子里第一个蹦出来的，可能是后羿。别急着反驳，我知道后羿是射手，箭法如神，能射日，听起来一点都不普通。但咱们换个角度，从他身上那些“凡人”的特质.............
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 百科问答小站 版权所有