为什么说『当你用空气动力学的定律来观察一支蝴蝶时,理论上它应该无法飞。但是蝴蝶并不明白物理定律，所以它可以飛翔。』？这个说法有根据吗？ 第1页

查了一下，这句话可能的原文是

"According to the laws of aerodynamics, a butterfly shouldn't be able to fly. But the butterfly doesn't know that, so it flies." This was Vincent Eades' mantra when he joined Starbucks Coffee in April 1995.

——这里我懒得去追查这句话到底是不是一个原产于国外网络段子手的成功学鸡汤了。

不过从网站上看，人家后面有一句话。

Three months later, Eades took flight and initiated one of the savviest coups in business history--a strategic partnership with the world's largest air carrier, United Airlines. By 1996, Starbucks had 80 million potential new customers, all of them flying at 35,000 feet.

于是这段话听起来就是一个冷到屁股都结块的烂故事……fly来fly去，fly my ass@！% ……@

如果要说背后有什么的话，我不想把话说的太难听，但是一个管理专业人士的给你灌的，看起来像科技方面的，但是带有浓厚的成功学或者哲学色彩的鸡汤，别管丫到底是鸡汤还是马粪榨汁，都是马粪汁的味道更重一些。。。