中概股也是人民币/美元基金的主要退出渠道之一,我记得机构统计Y18-Y19的数据是市值>$500m+的新上市的中概股项目破发率大约13%,当然,这些短期业绩波动的干扰项多,那么长期的数据支持是在两年统计区间的中概股项目全年价格趋势与纳指基准悖离了50个点,这么解读就是这些票的upside跑不过纳指基准了,美股是看基本面的,这可能就意味着分析师要对一些<新兴经济/科技>是否适合海外独立发展提出拷问了…,当然诸如$BABA这样壁垒更深、模式强壮、边际效益蒸蒸日上的产业龙头有更强的抗险能力。 这是倘若不考虑政治因素的解读。
也许这是一个趋势,但不会太快。执行过程会有反复,达到PCAOB会计要求也许可以做到,美国投资者需要时间撤离。这是第一枪,以后各州可能限制养老金入市买中概股。那样中概股流动性差了,估值低了。倘若真的有市场脱钩风险,倘若以后香港会失去特殊金融中心地位,那么港股也许变成中资自己玩。
会计审计问题主要在项目所在国的ZF,这个法案一出来,ZF必须在短期几年里解决它,否则所有中概股面临退市风险。美国围剿中概股会有一个过程:除了会计准则、审计和打假,还可以重罚协助造假上市的中介公司(投行和会计师事务所),然后限制养老金和投行资金那样监管的资金入市。在中概股全面退市前的几年里,也许会有许多次反弹行情,甚至有的股票会新高,毕竟资本都是短视的,尤其国内资金也比较自信。
The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act prohibits securities of a company from being listed on any of the U.S. securities exchanges if the company has failed to comply with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (PCAOB) audits for three years in a row. Congress established the PCAOB to inspect audits of public companies, ensuring the information companies provide to the public is accurate, independent and trustworthy. Currently, China’s communist government refuses to allow the PCAOB to inspect audits of companies registered in China and Hong Kong. Such companies represent a keen risk to American investors as nearly 11 percent of all securities class action lawsuits in 2011 were brought against Chinese-owned companies accused of misrepresenting themselves in financial documents.