为什么同样是回放设备，几乎没有人喜欢偏色的显示器，而有些人喜欢有音染的耳机或者音箱？ 第1页

谢邀，人在美国，刚下飞机。

“若音箱或者耳机本身是自然中性没有显著音染的，不会明显的改变音乐源文件声音，如果你认为这样“真实”的声音是没有感情的，那么说明要么音乐家和音乐没有感情，要么你自己没有感情。”

每次看到类似的问题，我就有点想笑。先雷击一下，

在这数十年来的大大小小的受控双盲听实验中，大多数人或者说平均而言，人们更偏向于自然均衡的音箱耳机声音。

或者说，没有任何实质性的证据证明人们普遍偏好有明显音染的耳机或者音箱。有持此类观点的人自己的话来说，他们就是在

纸上谈兵

没有任何实质性的科学受控的证据。

Your comments and questions relate to a 50 year research effort that I began as a government research scientist at the National Research Council of Canada. After 26 years of research and publications - not funded by a specific corporation or brand, I accepted an offer to join Harman International as Corporate VP Acoustical Engineering in 1991, and incorporate the scientific method into product design. As an unexpected bonus I was allowed to set up a corporate research group - not attached to any brand - to continue the scientific investigations, and to publish the results for all to see. You will find many papers by me and my colleagues in AES journals and preprints. The product of the research group was knowledge, not products. Remarkably, not all Harman products over the years have taken advantage of the science - such is the short sightedness of sales and marketing. Revel is a brand that believes in the scientific method, where double-blind listening provides guidance - how things sound is the driving force - and detailed correlations with comprehensive and accurate measurements follow that guidance. Starting with "neutral" loudspeakers is essential. Resonance and distortion free sound is a necessary foundation. Beyond that tone controls can provide compensation for variable recordings, personal preferences, etc.
So, yes, Revel loudspeakers figure prominently in these discussions because they exemplify the results of 50 years of research. The results of that research is in my books and numerous AES papers - it is in the public domain. Anyone can follow it if they choose to and thereby join the growing population of excellent, i.e. neutral, loudspeakers.
I have been accused in these forums of being a salesman for Revel, JBL, etc. Truly, as a scientist, I am a salesman for the scientific method, and the reproducible data that issue therefrom; something that is forever. Opinions come and go, but everybody is welcome to one
Although Samsung owns Harman, Harman still operates substantially independently - including budget, so the mass of money in Korea is not accessible to loudspeaker engineers in Northridge California. Things may or may not change.

您的评论和问题涉及我自加拿大国家研究委员会的政府研究科学家开始的50年的研究工作。在持续26年的研究和发表论文——没有得到某个公司或品牌的资助，我于1991年接受了加入哈曼国际公司并担任声学工程副总裁的邀请，将科学方法融入产品设计中。作为一个意外的奖励，我被允许成立了一个联合研究小组——不隶属于任何品牌——继续进行科学研究，并将结果公布给所有人。你会在AES杂志上找到我和我同事的许多论文。研究小组的成果是知识，而不是产品。值得注意的是，并非所有哈曼产品多年来都利用了科学技术——这就是销售和营销部门的短见。Revel是一个相信科学方法的品牌，在这种方法中，双盲听提供指导——声音是驱动力——与全面而准确的测量相关的详细信息遵循这一指导。从“中性”扬声器开始是必不可少的。无谐振和无失真的声音是必要的基础。除此之外，tone control还可以为多变的录音、个人喜好等提供补偿。

所以，是的，Revel扬声器在这些讨论中占据重要地位，因为它们代表了过去50年的研究成果。这项研究的结果在我的书和许多AES论文中都有——它是公开的。任何人都可以遵循它，如果他们愿意的话，从而加入到不断增长的优秀的、即“中性”的扬声器的家族中。

在这些论坛上，我被指责为Revel、JBL等品牌的推销员。事实上，作为一名科学家，我是科学方法和由此产生的可复制数据的推销员；这是永恒的。意见来了又去，但欢迎每个人都加入：）

虽然三星收购了哈曼，但哈曼仍然基本上是独立运营的，包括预算在内，因此在韩国的大笔资金对于加州北岭的扬声器工程师来说是无法获得的。事情可能会改变，也可能不会改变。

I think you misunderstand the results of the double-blind listening tests as correlated with anechoic data. If you read my book, it is all there. The simple interpretation is that listeners for 50 years have shown that they give the highest sound quality scores to loudspeakers with the least evidence of resonances (requiring a smooth, flat amplitude response), the most extended low-frequency bandwidth, and the least irregularities in off-axis frequency response (i.e. a relatively smooth and slowly changing directivity index). Since all of the voices and musical instruments we are entertained by consist of collections of resonances it is only logical that we notice when loudspeakers add their own to every sound they reproduce. This is what shows up very quickly in multiple-comparison double-blind tests. No special training is required.
The "best" loudspeaker, therefore can be interpreted as "the least colored".
Now, what about personal preferences in general spectral balance, and compensating for sometimes unfortunate spectral colorations in recordings? That is what equalizers and tone controls are for, and the best news is that starting with "neutral' loudspeakers allows those controls to be most effective. The next best news is that they can be turned off, in the event that you may want to hear what actually is in the recording. Check out the "circle of confusion".

我想你误解了双盲听测试的结果与消声室数据相关。如果你读了我的书，它就在那里。简单的解释是，50年来的听众已经证明，他们评分最高的扬声器，谐振最少（需要平滑、平坦的振幅响应），最深的低频下潜，以及最小的离轴频率响应不规则性（即相对平滑和缓慢变化的方向性指数）。因为我们所欣赏的所有声音和乐器都是由一系列的振动组成的，所以当扬声器将自己的声音加到它们所产生的每一个声音中时，我们就会注意到这一点。这是在多重比较双盲测试中很快出现的。无需特殊培训。

因此，可以把“最好的扬声器”解释为“音染最少的扬声器”。

那么，个人在三频分布的偏好，以及如何补偿录音中有时不幸的音染呢？这就是均衡器和音调控制的作用，而最好的消息是，从“中性”扬声器开始，这些控制将最为有效。第二个好消息是，如果你想知道录音中的内容，可以将其关闭。看看“音频怪圈”。