你在学术论文投稿时遇到过评价最好的审稿意见是什么？ 第1页

读博的时候一篇文章，两个审稿人，其中一个审稿人的意见。很暖心！

The authors have answered my questions properly, I agree its publication in its current form.

我这篇文章，我自己感觉做了一个不错的工作，审稿人的评价也不错。一连拿了几个accept或者minor。以至于编辑给我一直找审稿人，第8个终于给了major，才把意见返给我。

前面几个审稿人意见如下：

Reviewer #1:

The paper presents new experimental data related to the time-dependent response of geopolymer concrete. The overall paper is well articulated and is suitable for publication in the current form.


Reviewer #4:

The paper reports outcomes of a combined experimental and analytical study into the ageing coefficient for early age tensile creep of blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. The paper is of good quality and well-written.

Just a minor point that in Figure 1: "<tau>" should be revised to "<tau>0".




Reviewer #5:

This paper tested the ageing coefficient for early age tensile creep of blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Although it is a classical problem for the ordinary Portland cement based concrete, it is new for geopolymer concrete. This paper is well written and valueable to be pubulished in Construction and Building Materials. The followings are the suggestions:

1. What is the difference between the compressive and tensile creep? And, is it any difference about the ageing coefficient? More discussions should be added in the introdcution part to show the significance of this paper.

2. The strain curve shown in Fig.5 beacame increasing after the age of 7 days of geopolymer concrete. The volume expansion of concrete can not be called "shrinkage". Actually, it was so complicated. This paper did not focus on the shrinkage of geopolymer concrete. This value measured in the unloaded specimens was only used to calculate the creep strain in the loaded specimens. The reviewer suggests that "free strain in the unloaded specimens"is more suitable in this paper.


Reviewer #6:

The ageing coefficient for early age tensile creep of blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete was propose based on experimental program and numerical analysis in this manuscript. Ageing coefficient is essential for the creep analysis. This manuscript is well written. Some comments are listed:

1. Abstract in Page 1, "…, including instantaneous strain, creep strain and shrinkage strain were monitored …." should be "…, including instantaneous strain, creep strain and shrinkage strain, was monitored …."

2. Abstract in Page 2, "show" should be "shows".

3. Line 20, "increase" should be "the increase of" .

4. Line 23, "requires to model" should be "requires modelling of" .

5. Line 120, "distribution" should be "distributions" .

6. Line 174, "At the second day" should be "On the second day" .

7. Lines 181-203, the free shrinkage strain includes the drying shrinkage strain and the volume expansion. It is free strain rather than "free shrinkage strain".



Reviewer #7:

This paper presents a study on the ageing coefficient for early age tensile creep of blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. The tensile creep strain of this geopolymer concrete was measured. The creep coefficient and further ageing coefficient were determined with the experimental results. Overall, it is an interesting study. The test and analysis procedures are detailed and reliable. The manuscript can be accepted with the following revisions:

1. In Fig.7, some creep coefficient curves were calculated using 2-D interpolation. More details about the interpolation should be included.

2. Line 237, it was stated that " this value is consistent with the value of OPC-based concrete." What value of OPC-based concrete was compared with the recommended value in this paper? Compression creep or tensile creep? For creep problems or relaxation problems?

3. In Fig. 11, the references should be cited as this paper did not provide the test results.

这是文章大修一次之后得到的评论，审稿人说话真好听(=^▽^=)

Reviewer #1: Dear Authors!

You did a hell of a job! Congratulations!

The new revised version is much straightforward and easy to read and comprehend. All my questions and remarks were thoroughly resolved and elaborated, and it is my pleasure to give the green light for this publication.