是的,因为学术天赋是名校教授的护身符,是学术威信的基础,是争取项目的本钱所在,是一切。
这些天赋在圈内看来,毫不神秘,某次学术交流的早餐会上的只言片语,大家就能心领神会,你是用这个角度看的问题,还是你的参数确实解释得更好,你那个开关真绝,“唉,他已经跑到那儿了……”
其他能力当然也很好,但都是底气不足的补拙,哪儿有学术天赋香呢?
在学术圈,学术天赋就是龙骧虎步横行霸道的天赋神权。
话题添加经济学,那就谈经济学。 Medium 有篇文章可以参考
去年有篇文章,图表如何解读就看你了
Staying at the Top: The Ph.D. Origins of Economics Faculty
Academic origins in economics departments, defined as the universities at which tenure-track faculty completed their doctoral studies, may have implications for how the department’s undergraduate and PhD students are trained and placed, as well as the type of research produced. In this project, we use roster data on the academic origins of the tenure-track faculty at 96 U.S. economics departments with graduate degrees. We use these data to document patterns in academic origins across several dimensions, including department ranking, gender, rank (Assistant, Associate, Full Professor), and geography. We find that 1) over half of the faculty of each of eight top departments received their PhD from one of these same universities; 2) at least half of faculty from all top-25 departments come from top-15 universities; 3) over half of Harvard and MIT faculty received their PhD at either Harvard or MIT; and 4) over half of all faculty in the study come from top-15 universities, with Harvard, MIT, and the rest of the top six disproportionately represented. The first and third findings are more pronounced for female faculty.
之前有人答过,全国正高职称大约5万人,副高15万人。再限定个名校,你觉得呢?
国内情况是:靠关系留校的博士,靠实力当上了教务员。这是升副教授。现在排名靠前的大学,洋博士快把土博士卷没了,然后是洋博士们自己互掐。这是升教授。升院士才靠关系,教授以下的,院系领导也希望出业绩啊。然后啥叫“名教授”?网红、部委的专家组成员、美国科学院外籍院士,都是名教授。