百科问答小站 logo   百科问答小站
问题

新加坡前总理李光耀说过哪些发人深省的名言？

回答
李光耀先生，新加坡的国父，他的话语总是直指人心，充满着洞察力和对未来的预见。他不是一个哗众取宠的政客，而是一位务实、坚韧、对新加坡乃至亚洲的发展有着深刻理解的领导者。他的许多言论，即便在今天看来，依然如同智慧的灯塔，指引着我们思考。

我记得有一句话，他曾经说过：“如果你想让人们去完成某项任务，那么你必须让他们知道，如果他们不这样做，他们会遇到什么麻烦。” 这句话看似简单粗暴，但却极其深刻地揭示了人类行为的动机。它不是鼓励威胁或恐吓，而是强调了清晰的后果与责任。在治理一个国家，或者管理一个团队时，如果规则不明、责任不清，即使有再好的愿景，也难以落地。李光耀深谙此道，他用铁腕和严明纪律，为新加坡的繁荣奠定了基础，也让新加坡成为了世界上最干净、最有序的国家之一。这种“不成功便成仁”的决心，以及对规则的坚守，正是他希望传递给人们的。

还有一句同样发人深省的话是：“我不是一个理想主义者。我是一个实用主义者。我关心的是如何让新加坡能够生存和发展。” 这句话是理解李光耀政治哲学的关键。他不是一个空谈理念的人，他的所有决策都基于新加坡作为一个小国，如何在国际舞台上立足，如何为人民争取更好的生活。他曾说，新加坡没有自然资源，唯一的资源就是人民。因此，他将教育和人才视为最重要的投资。这种务实精神，让他能够不受意识形态的束缚，灵活地调整政策，与世界接轨，最终将新加坡打造成了一个全球性的经济和金融中心。他追求的是实实在在的成果，而不是虚无缥缈的口号。

我也很认同他关于“一个没有希望的国家，是没有未来的。”的说法。这里的“希望”并非指漫无边际的幻想，而是指人民对未来的信心，对国家发展前景的期盼，以及政府能够提供稳定和机会的能力。李光耀深知，经济发展、社会稳定、公正的法治，是构建国家希望的基石。他努力为新加坡人民创造一个能够实现自我价值的环境，让他们相信只要努力，就能改变命运。这种对希望的塑造，是任何一个伟大领导者都必须具备的智慧。

而他关于“文化是决定一个民族命运的重要因素。”的论述，也给我留下了深刻的印象。李光耀身处一个多元文化的国家，他深知文化融合与认同的重要性。他没有强行推行单一文化，而是尊重不同的文化传统，同时又强调新加坡人作为一个整体的共同身份。他曾多次谈到，新加坡的成功，不仅仅是经济上的，更在于如何在一个多元化的社会中，建立起共同的价值观和国家认同感，让不同种族、不同宗教的人们能够和谐共处，为同一个目标而奋斗。这是一种非常高明的文化策略，既包容又具有凝聚力。

最后，我想起他曾经说过的一段话，大致意思是：“我曾告诉我的同事们，如果我做的事是错的，我会道歉。但如果我是对的，我不会向任何人道歉。” 这句话展现了他坚定的信念和对自己判断的自信。当然，这并不是说他从不犯错，而是说在经过深思熟虑，并且对国家利益负责的前提下，他愿意坚持自己的道路。这种领导者的担当和魄力，是让人们信服的关键。他不是为了讨好任何人而做决定，而是为了新加坡的未来，为了人民的长远利益。

总而言之，李光耀先生的名言并非华丽辞藻的堆砌，而是他人生智慧和政治经验的凝结。它们教会我们，作为一个国家，需要务实的精神、对未来的清晰规划、对人民的承诺，以及塑造国家希望和认同的能力。他的话语，如同陈年的佳酿，越品越有味，越发显露出其深刻的洞察力和不朽的价值。

网友意见

user avatar

关于李光耀的名言录还是看英文原版的比较好，比翻译成中文的更纯正。推荐这本THE WIT & WISDOM OF Lee Kuan Yew [1923-2015]，记录了李光耀1955年从政以来到他去世之前所有发人深省的名言，是一本不可多得的，可以帮助提高英文写作和表达能力的李光耀语录，在新加坡本地的书店或者亚马逊上都能买到。

摘抄其中几句和几段名言：

  1. I do not yet know of a man who became a leader as a result of having undergone a leadership course.
  2. The weakness of democracy is that the assumption that all men are equal and capable of equal contribution to the common good is flawed.
  3. Every generation has a quota of those who feel that society does not give them the status, the position, the influence, the rewards, that they deserve. They want to overturn the order of things.
  4. You're talking about Rwanda or Bangladesh, or Cambodia, or the Philippines. They've got democracy ... But have you got a civilized life to lead? People want economic development first and foremost. The leaders may talk something else. You take a poll of any people. What they want? The right to write an editorial as you like? They want homes, medicine, jobs, schools.
  5. From my observation, the monolinguist is more likely to be a language chauvinist and a bigot. He only sees the world through one eye. He does not have binocular vision to see the world in depth, to realise that there are as rich, if not richer, worlds of human experience and knowledge, all expressed in beautiful words, elegantly, vividly and fluently in other languages. He does not understand other great civilisations which have expressed themselves in other languages.
  6. We cannot measure our happiness just by our GDP growth. It is how our families and friends care for each other, how we look after our old and nurture our young, they are what make for a closely knit society, one we can be proud to belong to.
  7. I have been accused of many things in my life, but not even my worst enemy has ever accused me of being afraid to speak my mind.
  8. If govenrment workers are adequately paid, they deserved to be punished with severe penalties when they take bribes.
  9. Even in the capitalist West where they have tried throwing money at problems, what is the end result? You go down New York, Broadway. You will see the beggars, people on the streets. Worse than in the 1950s and in the early ’60s before the Great Society programmes. Why? Why did it get worse after compassion moved a President, motivated with a great vision of a society which was wealthy and cared for, could look after everybody – the blacks, the minorities, the dispossessed, the disadvantaged. There is more unhappiness and more hardship today and more beggars, more muggers. Why is that? Have we not learnt? Where are the beggars in Singapore? Show me. I take pride in that. Has anybody died of starvation? Anybody without a home left to die in the streets and have to be collected as dead corpses? Because we came to the realistic conclusion that the human being is motivated by instincts that go deep down into the basic genes of life. And the first basic instinct is to protect yourself, and stronger than that, to protect your offspring so that there is the next generation. You kill that link, you have killed off mankind.
  10. How do you think today's Singapore came about? Becasue everyone knows if I say that we are going in a certain directoin and that we're going to achieve this objective, if you set out to block me, I will take a bulldozer and clear the obstruction. I leave nobody in any doubt that is where we are going and that any obstruction wiil be cleared. So there were very few obstructions. So we got the highway cleared and travelled to our destination.

类似的话题

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等

© 2025 tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 百科问答小站 版权所有

服务条款
联系我们
关于我们
隐私政策
友情链接
知乎
百度问答
搜狐
新浪