百科问答小站 logo
百科问答小站 font logo



审稿意见怎么回复?需要注意什么? 第1页

  

user avatar   da-kou-ge-31 网友的相关建议: 
      

开头先感谢一下审稿人:

Dear reviewers,

Thank you very much for your kindly comments on our manuscript. There is no doubt that these comments are valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our manuscript. In what follows, we would like to answer the questions you mentioned and give detailed account of the changes made to the original manuscript.

回复审稿意见时经常会遇到以下几种情况:

  1. 审稿人让你引用某些文章。回复:Thank you for your introduction to these wonderful research work. According to your suggestion, we properly cite these articles as:
  2. 审稿人挑了一些语法问题,并让你好好检查一下。回复:Thank you for your significant reminding. According to your suggestion, we corrected the above grammatical errors and made an effort to correct the spelling and grammar errors and polish the whole manuscript. We would like to confirm that the suitably revised manuscript is understandable to readers.

回复完所有意见后,最后再感谢一下审稿人:

Thank you again for your positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript.

We hope you will find our revised manuscript acceptable for publication.

点对点回复时首先感谢审稿人提的建议,由于意见较多,可以有以下几种感谢句式:

  • Thanks for your valuable counsel.
  • Thank you for pointing this out.
  • Thank you for your significant reminding.

最后,上传修改稿时会给编辑写一封Cover letter (或者叫做Revision letter,或Resubmission letter),主要目的是向编辑说明我们做了哪些修改。

格式如下:

Dear Prof. 编辑的名字,


On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate the reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “手稿标题”. (Manuscript ID: ####).

We study the comments carefully and make revision which we hope meet with approval.

According to the reviewers' comments,

1) We described the role of the *****.

2) We explained the ***.

The main revision in the paper and the response to the reviewers' comments are detailedly indicated in the attached file “Responses to comments”, and all changes are also highlighted in the attached PDF “marked-up version”.

We hope you will find our revised manuscript acceptable for publication.

Yours sincerely,

***

觉得有用的朋友可以关注我,后面我会更新!




  

相关话题

  如何看待中南大学 92 年特聘教授齐冲冲,3 年博士期间发表 40 篇 SCI? 
  回复审稿人补实验的要求时,能否直接表达自己暂时没有条件补实验? 
  SCI文章审稿后被拒,编辑建议转投其他期刊,这样转投中的几率大吗? 
  如何看待美国数学学会(AMS)即将在其旗下期刊进行数学论文双盲审? 
  上海理工大学副校长刘平两篇文章发表在不同期刊中文论文,大面积文字一样,图也一样,算不算学术不端? 
  发表论文导师拿一作,给学生通讯,这样有用吗? 
  本科生有可能发一篇SCI的综述性paper吗? 
  期刊一样的情况下,一篇六人论文的一作,和两篇三人论文的二作,哪个含金量高? 
  如何评价KDD 2021的审稿结果?有哪些亮眼的成果? 
  如何看待张文宏医生论文被查? 

前一个讨论
有人用过工业路由器吗?哪个牌子的靠谱?
下一个讨论
2021年人工智能领域有哪些关键性进展和突破?





© 2024-11-22 - tinynew.org. All Rights Reserved.
© 2024-11-22 - tinynew.org. 保留所有权利