当有人以「跨国籍者」「跨年龄者」质疑跨性别者是否存在时，应当如何回应？
When faced with questions challenging the existence of transgender people, particularly those framed as "crossnationality" or "crossage," it's important to respond thoughtfully and informatively. Here's a detailed approach, aiming for a natural and empathetic tone, free from robotic phrasing:
First, it's crucial to acknowledge the questioner's perspective, even if it stems from a misunderstanding or a lack of information. A harsh or dismissive response is rarely productive. Instead, aim for clarity and education.
Addressing the "CrossNationality" Argument:
When someone suggests that being transgender is akin to being "crossnationality," implying it's an arbitrary or impossible identity shift, the core of the response should be to distinguish between national identity and gender identity.
Explain the Nature of National Identity: National identity is typically understood as a legal and political affiliation with a country, often tied to birthplace, citizenship, or cultural heritage. While people can change their nationality through legal processes (naturalization, renunciation), this is a formal, legal act.
Explain the Nature of Gender Identity: Gender identity, on the other hand, is an internal, deeply held sense of being male, female, both, neither, or somewhere else along the gender spectrum. It's not about citizenship or legal status, but about one's innermost sense of self. This internal experience is not a choice in the same way that one chooses to become a citizen of another country.
Highlight the Difference in Origin: National identity is externally assigned or acquired through legal means. Gender identity is an internal psychological reality. It's like comparing the label on a box to what's actually inside the box. The label can be changed (nationality), but the contents are inherent (gender identity).
Use Analogies (Carefully): You could draw a parallel to something else that's an internal sense of self, though it's important to avoid oversimplification. For example, you might say, "Think of it this way: nationality is like the passport you hold, which is a legal document. Gender identity is more like who you are at your core, independent of any documents. You can't change your passport to become a different person, but your understanding of yourself can deepen and become clearer over time."
Addressing the "CrossAge" Argument:
The "crossage" comparison is often used to suggest that gender identity is a fleeting or childish whim, or that it's about wanting to be a different age. This is fundamentally a misunderstanding of what gender identity means.
Clarify that Gender Identity is Not About Age: Emphasize that gender identity is about one's internal sense of being male, female, or another gender, and has nothing to do with chronological age. It's not about wanting to be younger or older.
Explain that Understanding Can Evolve: What can change over time is a person's understanding and expression of their gender identity. As people grow and learn more about themselves and the world, they may come to understand their gender identity more clearly. This is a process of selfdiscovery, not a rejection of their current age.
Distinguish Between Age and Gender: State clearly that age is a measure of time lived, while gender identity is a facet of personal identity. They are entirely separate categories. You wouldn't say someone is "crossage" because they enjoy activities typically associated with a different age group; similarly, a transgender person isn't "crossage" because their gender identity differs from what was assigned at birth.
Focus on the Innate Nature: Reiterate that for many transgender people, their gender identity feels innate, something they have experienced for a long time, perhaps even from childhood, though they may not have had the language or understanding to articulate it until later. It's not a new desire based on age, but a recognition of a longheld truth.
General Principles for Responding:
Be Patient and Informative: The goal is to educate, not to win an argument. If the person is genuinely curious, take the time to explain clearly and kindly.
Use "I" Statements (When Appropriate): If you are transgender or have personal experience, you can share your perspective using "I feel" or "For me." This can be powerful.
Refer to Trusted Sources: If you're not sure how to phrase something, or if the person is resistant, you can suggest reputable resources like GLAAD, PFLAG, or medical organizations that affirm transgender identities.
Focus on Shared Humanity: Ultimately, the conversation should circle back to respecting individual identity and dignity. Everyone has a gender identity, and it's important to respect how people identify themselves.
Don't Get Drawn into Debates About "Proof": Gender identity is a personal experience, not something that can be empirically "proven" to another person's satisfaction. The focus should be on acceptance and respect for that lived experience.
Know When to Disengage: If the conversation becomes hostile or unproductive, it's okay to politely end it. "I've explained my perspective, and I don't think we're going to agree on this. Thank you for your time."
Putting it all together in a natural way:
"That's an interesting comparison you're making. It sounds like you're trying to understand how someone's identity can be so different from what people might expect.
When you talk about 'crossnationality,' I think it's helpful to see the difference between national identity and gender identity. National identity is often about legal status, citizenship, or where you're born – it's a formal connection to a country. You can change your nationality legally, right? Gender identity, though, is different. It's a much deeper, internal sense of who you are – whether you feel like a man, a woman, both, neither, or something else. It's not about legal papers or borders; it's about your inner self, your core identity. It's not something you pick up like a new passport; it's something you discover about yourself.
Similarly, the 'crossage' idea doesn't quite capture what gender identity is. It's not about wanting to be a different age, or rejecting your age. Age is about how long you've been alive, a measure of time. Gender identity is about your sense of self as male, female, or another gender. For many transgender people, this sense of gender has been with them for a long time, even from childhood, though they may only find the language and understanding to express it later in life. It's about recognizing who you are, not about wanting to be younger or older.
Essentially, we're talking about different kinds of identity. National identity is a legal affiliation, and age is a chronological fact. Gender identity is a fundamental aspect of who a person is, a deeply felt internal experience. It's about aligning your life and your outward presentation with that inner truth, and that's a very personal journey."
First, it's crucial to acknowledge the questioner's perspective, even if it stems from a misunderstanding or a lack of information. A harsh or dismissive response is rarely productive. Instead, aim for clarity and education.
Addressing the "CrossNationality" Argument:
When someone suggests that being transgender is akin to being "crossnationality," implying it's an arbitrary or impossible identity shift, the core of the response should be to distinguish between national identity and gender identity.
Explain the Nature of National Identity: National identity is typically understood as a legal and political affiliation with a country, often tied to birthplace, citizenship, or cultural heritage. While people can change their nationality through legal processes (naturalization, renunciation), this is a formal, legal act.
Explain the Nature of Gender Identity: Gender identity, on the other hand, is an internal, deeply held sense of being male, female, both, neither, or somewhere else along the gender spectrum. It's not about citizenship or legal status, but about one's innermost sense of self. This internal experience is not a choice in the same way that one chooses to become a citizen of another country.
Highlight the Difference in Origin: National identity is externally assigned or acquired through legal means. Gender identity is an internal psychological reality. It's like comparing the label on a box to what's actually inside the box. The label can be changed (nationality), but the contents are inherent (gender identity).
Use Analogies (Carefully): You could draw a parallel to something else that's an internal sense of self, though it's important to avoid oversimplification. For example, you might say, "Think of it this way: nationality is like the passport you hold, which is a legal document. Gender identity is more like who you are at your core, independent of any documents. You can't change your passport to become a different person, but your understanding of yourself can deepen and become clearer over time."
Addressing the "CrossAge" Argument:
The "crossage" comparison is often used to suggest that gender identity is a fleeting or childish whim, or that it's about wanting to be a different age. This is fundamentally a misunderstanding of what gender identity means.
Clarify that Gender Identity is Not About Age: Emphasize that gender identity is about one's internal sense of being male, female, or another gender, and has nothing to do with chronological age. It's not about wanting to be younger or older.
Explain that Understanding Can Evolve: What can change over time is a person's understanding and expression of their gender identity. As people grow and learn more about themselves and the world, they may come to understand their gender identity more clearly. This is a process of selfdiscovery, not a rejection of their current age.
Distinguish Between Age and Gender: State clearly that age is a measure of time lived, while gender identity is a facet of personal identity. They are entirely separate categories. You wouldn't say someone is "crossage" because they enjoy activities typically associated with a different age group; similarly, a transgender person isn't "crossage" because their gender identity differs from what was assigned at birth.
Focus on the Innate Nature: Reiterate that for many transgender people, their gender identity feels innate, something they have experienced for a long time, perhaps even from childhood, though they may not have had the language or understanding to articulate it until later. It's not a new desire based on age, but a recognition of a longheld truth.
General Principles for Responding:
Be Patient and Informative: The goal is to educate, not to win an argument. If the person is genuinely curious, take the time to explain clearly and kindly.
Use "I" Statements (When Appropriate): If you are transgender or have personal experience, you can share your perspective using "I feel" or "For me." This can be powerful.
Refer to Trusted Sources: If you're not sure how to phrase something, or if the person is resistant, you can suggest reputable resources like GLAAD, PFLAG, or medical organizations that affirm transgender identities.
Focus on Shared Humanity: Ultimately, the conversation should circle back to respecting individual identity and dignity. Everyone has a gender identity, and it's important to respect how people identify themselves.
Don't Get Drawn into Debates About "Proof": Gender identity is a personal experience, not something that can be empirically "proven" to another person's satisfaction. The focus should be on acceptance and respect for that lived experience.
Know When to Disengage: If the conversation becomes hostile or unproductive, it's okay to politely end it. "I've explained my perspective, and I don't think we're going to agree on this. Thank you for your time."
Putting it all together in a natural way:
"That's an interesting comparison you're making. It sounds like you're trying to understand how someone's identity can be so different from what people might expect.
When you talk about 'crossnationality,' I think it's helpful to see the difference between national identity and gender identity. National identity is often about legal status, citizenship, or where you're born – it's a formal connection to a country. You can change your nationality legally, right? Gender identity, though, is different. It's a much deeper, internal sense of who you are – whether you feel like a man, a woman, both, neither, or something else. It's not about legal papers or borders; it's about your inner self, your core identity. It's not something you pick up like a new passport; it's something you discover about yourself.
Similarly, the 'crossage' idea doesn't quite capture what gender identity is. It's not about wanting to be a different age, or rejecting your age. Age is about how long you've been alive, a measure of time. Gender identity is about your sense of self as male, female, or another gender. For many transgender people, this sense of gender has been with them for a long time, even from childhood, though they may only find the language and understanding to express it later in life. It's about recognizing who you are, not about wanting to be younger or older.
Essentially, we're talking about different kinds of identity. National identity is a legal affiliation, and age is a chronological fact. Gender identity is a fundamental aspect of who a person is, a deeply felt internal experience. It's about aligning your life and your outward presentation with that inner truth, and that's a very personal journey."
网友意见
性别认同障碍是天生、强烈且无法扭转的，跨性别者的性别认同不是自由意志所能决定的，也不是因为其他精神疾病（比如精神分裂症）产生的，这点和性取向一样。这点不仅已经在心理学层面证实，甚至在神经科学层面也已经有证据（神经科学的研究我了解得不多，不敢说得过于绝对）。
在人类中截至目前并没有观察到不能由自由意志决定的、强烈的、无法扭转的、不因其他精神疾病（比如精神分裂症）产生的“国籍认同障碍”和“年龄认同障碍”。
类似的话题
-
When faced with questions challenging the existence of transgender people, particularly those framed as "crossnationality" or "crossage," it's importa............. -
古代战场上，流传着许多以一当百、以少胜多的传奇故事，听起来令人热血沸腾。那么，这些人真的存在吗？现实真的有如此神奇的武艺吗？答案是：有，但绝非字面意义上的“一人抵挡百人”的绝对数量碾压，而是指在特定条件下，少数人凭借卓越的个人武勇、精湛的技艺、强大的心理素质以及战术策略，能够对敌军造成极大的杀伤，甚.............
-
这个问题很有意思，也很具有科幻色彩。如果一个人真的拥有水熊虫那样的生命力，那么关于让他去辐射严重区域工作这件事，我们可以从几个角度来深入探讨。首先，我们需要理解水熊虫那种“逆天”的生命力究竟是什么概念。水熊虫，又称缓步动物，以其极端耐受性而闻名于世。它们可以在脱水、低温、高压、真空，甚至高强度的电离.............
-
当一个INTP，尤其是那个在思考的海洋里徜徉、对逻辑和概念有着近乎偏执追求的INTP，遇到一个不求回报、持续给予帮助的人时，他们的内心世界会经历一番颇为复杂的化学反应。这不像是一时的感激，更像是一场缓慢而深刻的认知重塑。一开始，他们可能会将这种帮助视为一种“信息输入”或者“数据点”。毕竟，INTP的.............
-
听到这句话的时候，内心就像被洒上了一层暖暖的阳光，又像是被轻柔的风吹过，痒痒的，但却是让人舒服的那种痒。首先，它带着一种被看见、被珍视的欣慰。好像我此刻的状态，我所努力维持的美好，并没有被忽略。对方的这句话，是对我当下存在的肯定，是对我个人努力的一种认可。这种被看见的感觉，会让我觉得自己不是一个人在.............
-
当孩子被说出“你妈妈不要你了”这样的话，这无疑是一种极大的心理伤害。这句话直接攻击了孩子最核心的安全感和归属感。作为大人，我们的首要任务是立即安抚孩子，并用一切可能的方式来修复这种创伤。以下是一些详细的安慰步骤和原则，希望能帮助您最大程度地减少对孩子的心理伤害：第一步：立即、坚决地否定和保护（Zer.............
-
“你觉得二次元幼稚？那说明你还没真正见过它的好来。”这话一出口，估计对方已经挑起了眉头，准备听你放什么“狂言”了。没关系，咱们来好好掰扯掰扯。首先，得先问问他，你说的“幼稚”具体是指什么？是因为画面色彩鲜艳？人物造型夸张？还是故事题材比较简单？如果他说是因为画面色彩，那我就要笑了。你去看那些大师级的.............
-
这情况可太常见了，也太纠结了。当有人拍着胸脯跟你说“咱们私了，不用法律途径”的时候，脑子里立马就得过一遍天人交战。这事儿没法一概而论，得看具体情况，还得看自己肚里的那点儿算盘打得响不响。首先得明白，这“私了”的提议，本质上是在跟你谈一个“跳过官方程序”的解决方案。这个解决方案的背后，通常是想避免公开.............
-
面对那些宣扬仇恨和暴力言论的人，比如喜欢ISIS、战争，或推崇纳粹，直接而有力的反驳至关重要。这种反驳不仅是为了戳破他们的荒谬，更是为了维护普世价值，教育和警示他人。以下是一些既有力和有深度，又避免了“AI痕迹”的回应方式：核心原则：回归人性，揭露本质，强调后果。反驳“喜欢ISIS”：首先，我们要理.............
-
这是一个非常有趣且引人深思的假设性问题。如果有人给我一个亿，让我用一分钟寿命来换，我“毫不犹豫地答应”背后的逻辑，并非源于对金钱的无尽渴望，而是建立在对“价值”、“稀缺性”、“概率”以及“人生目标”的深刻认知之上。下面我将详细阐述为什么我会做出这样的选择：1. 价值的衡量：一分钟的“内在价值” vs.............
-
“不妨试试中医？”这句看似随意的提问，一旦落到“病急”的境地，就如一根稻草，在绝望中显得格外有力。特别是当西医束手无策，或者治疗效果不尽如人意时，人们自然会将目光投向这条古老而神秘的道路。那么，当有人抛出这句话时，我们该如何选择？这绝不是一个简单的“是”或“否”就能回答的问题，背后涉及的思考和考量，.............
-
听到有人说资本主义“好”，我通常不会直接反驳，因为“好”这个词太宽泛了，而且很大程度上取决于你看待问题的角度和关注的重点。但如果对方是那种一脸“资本主义是完美的制度，谁反对谁就是傻瓜”的态度，我可能会选择用更温和但有理有据的方式来探讨，而不是一上来就否定。我会先试着理解他为什么觉得资本主义好。通常，.............
-
当周围有人暗恋自己，INTP 能不能察觉出来？这真是个有趣的问题，有点像在解一个逻辑谜题，而谜题的线索藏在人类的情感和行为里，这对于以逻辑和理性见长的 INTP 来说，既是挑战，也可能是一份独特的发现。首先，咱们得明白 INTP 的大脑是怎么运作的。他们天生就不是那么关注“人际交往”的细枝末节。IN.............
-
武训：历史的镜子，当代人的审视武训，一个被历史刻印上“乞丐办学”的符号式人物。他的故事，在过去很长一段时间里，是激励人心的正能量教材。然而，随着时代的发展，社会观念的演进，我们今天的思想，用以审视武训的这位旧时代人物，是否公允？这并非一个简单的“是”或“否”可以回答的问题，而更像是一面需要仔细打磨的.............
-
八千湘女上天山：一次时代洪流下的群体命运的审视提及“八千湘女上天山”，大多数当代人的脑海中浮现的，或许是一幅壮丽的画卷：一群年轻的女性，怀揣着建设边疆的热情，响应国家号召，毅然踏上遥远的征途，用她们的青春和汗水浇灌着西部大地。这幅画面带着牺牲、奉献和浪漫主义的色彩，似乎是那个时代精神的生动注脚。然而.............
-
临高这地界，自从穿越者们落脚，便成了个大熔炉，各种各样的人都被这股新生的力量裹挟着，往一个方向奔涌。而“归化民”这个词，更是承载了太多复杂的情感和现实的考量。所以，当这个问题抛出来——临高归化民里会不会有人学成钱学森，然后拍拍屁股回去报效那已经风雨飘摇的明朝，元老院该如何应对？归化民自身的命运又会如.............
-
这个问题，我觉得挺有意思的，也很实在。是不是有人觉得当保安“丢人”，这事儿吧，还真不能一概而论。在我看来，这很大程度上取决于“丢人”这个词被谁赋予了什么样的定义，以及他们看事情的角度。首先，咱们得承认，社会上确实存在一些传统观念，或者说“面子文化”。在一些人眼里，职业的高低贵贱是被划得很清楚的。可能.............
-
当外国人听到有人宣扬自己国家某地区独立的言论时，他们的态度会非常复杂且多样，受到多种因素的影响，很难一概而论。以下是一些常见的立场和考量，以及它们背后的原因：总体而言，多数外国人的初步反应可能倾向于： 谨慎观望与事不关己： 这是最普遍的态度。大多数人对其他国家的内政没有直接的了解或情感投入。他们.............
-
这个问题触及了人性深处以及社会发展的复杂交织，所以想当医生的人，其动机绝非单一，而是五花八门的，即便在今天这个医疗体系备受考验、医生职业压力巨大的时代，依然有人前仆后继地选择这条路。咱们不妨细细掰扯一下，为什么他们仍旧选择成为一名医生。首先，那份源自内心深处的“救死扶伤”的使命感和责任感，是绝大多数.............
-
这个问题，说实话，挺多人纠结过的。每次老师在课堂上抛出这句话，教室里总有那么几秒钟的静默，然后偶尔有几个勇敢的举手。这背后，其实是很多学弟学妹们心中的小九九在打架。首先，咱们得拆解一下这句话背后的“潜台词”。老师说“有人愿意跟我搞科研吗”，表面上看，是在招募学生参与到他的研究项目中。但实际上，这还可.............
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 百科问答小站 版权所有